Abraham R T, Ho S N, Barna T J, McKean D J
J Biol Chem. 1987 Feb 25;262(6):2719-28.
The murine T lymphoma line, LBRM-33 1A5, requires synergistic signals delivered by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and interleukin 1 (IL1) for activation to high level interleukin 2 production. The activation signals provided by PHA and IL1 were replaced by the Ca2+ ionophore, ionomycin, and the phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), respectively. These observations supported a two-signal model for T cell activation involving increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) (signal 1) and activation of protein kinase C (signal 2) as necessary and sufficient events. However, biochemical analyses revealed that additional signals were involved in the activation of LBRM-33 cells by both receptor-dependent and -independent mediators. Both signal 1-type mediators, PHA and ionomycin, exerted pleiotropic effects at the concentrations required for synergy with signal 2-type mediators (IL1, TPA). Within 1-2 min of addition, PHA stimulated phospholipid turnover, including hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, Ca2+ mobilization, and protein kinase C activation. The [Ca2+]i increase induced by PHA was due to influx from both intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ pools. Similarly, ionomycin increased phospholipid turnover, [Ca2+]i, and directly affected protein kinase C activity in LBRM-33 cells. In contrast, the signal 2-type mediators, TPA and IL1, appeared to act by distinct intracellular mechanisms. TPA induced a protracted association of cellular protein kinase C with the plasma membrane, consistent with the two-signal activation model. Furthermore, acute TPA treatment inhibited PHA-stimulated inositol phosphate release and Ca2+ mobilization, suggesting that this mediator partially antagonized signal 1 delivery. IL1, in contrast, neither activated protein kinase C directly nor did it positively modulate the coupling of signal 1-type mediators to [Ca2+]i or protein kinase C via the phosphoinositide pathway. The intracellular signal delivered by IL1 is, therefore, generated through a mechanism distinct from or distal to the activation of protein kinase C. These studies indicate that the two-signal hypothesis, in its simplest form, is inadequate to explain the signals required for the initiation of IL1-dependent T cell activation.
小鼠T淋巴瘤细胞系LBRM - 33 1A5需要由植物血凝素(PHA)和白细胞介素1(IL1)传递的协同信号才能被激活,从而高水平产生白细胞介素2。PHA和IL1提供的激活信号分别被钙离子载体离子霉素和佛波酯12 - O -十四酰佛波醇13 -乙酸酯(TPA)所取代。这些观察结果支持了T细胞激活的双信号模型,该模型涉及细胞内钙离子浓度([Ca2+]i)的升高(信号1)和蛋白激酶C的激活(信号2),这两个事件是必要且充分的。然而,生化分析表明,受体依赖性和非依赖性介质激活LBRM - 33细胞还涉及其他信号。信号1型介质PHA和离子霉素在与信号2型介质(IL1、TPA)协同所需的浓度下发挥多效性作用。添加后1 - 2分钟内,PHA刺激磷脂周转,包括磷脂酰肌醇4,5 -二磷酸的水解、钙离子动员和蛋白激酶C激活。PHA诱导的[Ca2+]i升高是由于细胞内和细胞外钙离子池的流入。同样,离子霉素增加了磷脂周转、[Ca2+]i,并直接影响LBRM - 33细胞中的蛋白激酶C活性。相比之下,信号2型介质TPA和IL1似乎通过不同的细胞内机制起作用。TPA诱导细胞蛋白激酶C与质膜的持久结合,这与双信号激活模型一致。此外,急性TPA处理抑制了PHA刺激的肌醇磷酸释放和钙离子动员,表明该介质部分拮抗信号1的传递。相比之下,IL1既不直接激活蛋白激酶C,也没有通过磷酸肌醇途径正向调节信号1型介质与[Ca2+]i或蛋白激酶C的偶联。因此,IL1传递的细胞内信号是通过一种不同于蛋白激酶C激活或在其激活远端的机制产生的。这些研究表明,最简单形式的双信号假说不足以解释IL1依赖性T细胞激活起始所需的信号。