强化降压对肾小管损伤的影响:来自 ACCORD 试验研究参与者的发现。
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Kidney Tubule Injury: Findings From the ACCORD Trial Study Participants.
机构信息
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
出版信息
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Jan;73(1):31-38. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Random assignment to intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering (systolic BP<120mmHg) compared to a less intensive BP target (systolic BP<140mmHg) in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes BP (ACCORD-BP) trial resulted in a more rapid decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Whether this reflects hemodynamic effects or intrinsic kidney damage is unknown.
STUDY DESIGN
Longitudinal analysis of a subgroup of clinical trial participants.
SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: A subgroup of 529 participants in ACCORD-BP.
EXPOSURES
Urine biomarkers of tubular injury (kidney injury molecule 1, interleukin 18 [IL-18]), repair (human cartilage glycoprotein 39 [YKL-40]), and inflammation (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) at baseline and year 2.
OUTCOMES
Changes in eGFR from baseline to 2 years.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH
We compared changes in biomarker levels and eGFRs across participants treated to an intensive versus less intensive BP goal using analysis of covariance.
RESULTS
Of 529 participants, 260 had been randomly assigned to the intensive and 269 to the standard BP arm. Mean age was 62±6.5 years and eGFR was 90mL/min/1.73m. Baseline clinical characteristics, eGFRs, urinary albumin-creatinine ratios (ACRs), and urinary biomarker levels were similar across BP treatment groups. Compared to less intensive BP treatment, eGFR was 9.2mL/min/1.73m lower in the intensive BP treatment group at year 2. Despite the eGFR reduction, within this treatment group, ACR was 30% lower and 4 urinary biomarker levels were unchanged or lower at year 2. Also within this group, participants with the largest declines in eGFRs had greater reductions in urinary IL-18 and YKL-40 levels. In a subgroup analysis of participants developing incident chronic kidney disease (sustained 30% decline and eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m; n=77), neither ACR nor 4 biomarker levels increased in the intensive treatment group, whereas the level of 1 biomarker, IL-18, increased in the less intensive treatment group.
LIMITATIONS
Few participants with advanced baseline chronic kidney disease. Comparisons across treatment groups do not represent comparisons of treatment arms created solely through randomization.
CONCLUSIONS
Among a subset of ACCORD-BP trial participants, intensive BP control was associated with reductions in eGFRs, but not with an increase in injury marker levels. These findings support that eGFR decline observed with intensive BP goals in ACCORD participants may predominantly reflect hemodynamic alterations.
背景与目的
与目标血压较低(收缩压<140mmHg)相比,ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES 血压试验(ACCORD-BP)中随机分配的强化降压(收缩压<120mmHg)导致估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降更快。这是否反映了血流动力学的影响还是肾脏的固有损伤尚不清楚。
研究设计
临床试验参与者的亚组纵向分析。
设置和参与者
ACCORD-BP 中 529 名参与者的一个亚组。
暴露
基线和第 2 年时尿中肾小管损伤(肾损伤分子 1、白细胞介素 18 [IL-18])、修复(人软骨糖蛋白 39 [YKL-40])和炎症(单核细胞趋化蛋白 1)的生物标志物。
结局
从基线到 2 年时 eGFR 的变化。
分析方法
我们使用协方差分析比较了接受强化与标准血压目标治疗的参与者之间生物标志物水平和 eGFR 的变化。
结果
在 529 名参与者中,260 名被随机分配到强化治疗组,269 名被分配到标准治疗组。平均年龄为 62±6.5 岁,eGFR 为 90mL/min/1.73m。基线临床特征、eGFR、尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(ACR)和尿生物标志物水平在血压治疗组之间相似。与标准血压治疗相比,强化血压治疗组第 2 年时 eGFR 降低 9.2mL/min/1.73m。尽管 eGFR 下降,但在该治疗组中,ACR 降低了 30%,4 种尿生物标志物水平在第 2 年保持不变或降低。在该组中,eGFR 下降最大的参与者,其尿 IL-18 和 YKL-40 水平下降幅度更大。在发生慢性肾脏病事件的参与者亚组分析(持续 30%下降和 eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m;n=77)中,强化治疗组的 ACR 或 4 种生物标志物水平均未升高,而在标准治疗组中,1 种生物标志物 IL-18 水平升高。
局限性
基线慢性肾脏病晚期患者较少。治疗组间的比较不能代表仅通过随机分组产生的治疗组间的比较。
结论
在 ACCORD-BP 试验的一个亚组参与者中,强化血压控制与 eGFR 下降有关,但与损伤标志物水平的升高无关。这些发现支持在 ACCORD 参与者中使用强化血压目标观察到的 eGFR 下降主要反映了血流动力学改变。