Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development, Uxbridge, UK.
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1519-1529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30-50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515.
Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68-0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (<1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (<1%) deaths in the albiglutide group.
In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
GlaxoSmithKline.
胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂在化学结构、作用持续时间和对临床结局的影响方面存在差异。在 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次的阿必鲁肽的心血管作用尚不清楚。我们旨在确定阿必鲁肽在预防心血管死亡、心肌梗死或中风方面的安全性和有效性。
我们在 28 个国家的 610 个地点进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。我们将年龄在 40 岁及以上、患有 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病的患者(1:1 比例随机分配)分为两组,一组接受皮下注射阿必鲁肽(根据血糖反应和耐受性,剂量为 30-50mg),另一组接受匹配体积的安慰剂,每周一次,此外还接受标准治疗。研究人员使用交互式语音或网络应答系统获得治疗分配,患者和所有研究人员均对其治疗分配进行了盲法。我们假设阿必鲁肽在主要复合终点(心血管死亡、心肌梗死或中风的首次发生)方面不劣于安慰剂,该终点在意向治疗人群中进行评估。如果上限小于 1.30 的危险比的 95%置信区间证实了非劣效性,则预先设定了优越性的封闭检验。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02465515。
患者于 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 11 月 24 日进行筛选。共有 10793 名患者接受了筛选,9463 名患者入组并随机分配到两组:4731 名患者接受阿必鲁肽治疗,4732 名患者接受安慰剂治疗。2017 年 11 月 8 日,确定已累积至少 611 个主要终点和中位随访至少 1.5 年,参与者返回进行最后一次就诊和停止研究治疗;最后一次患者就诊时间为 2018 年 3 月 12 日。这 9463 名患者(意向治疗人群)接受了中位 1.6 年的评估,并对主要终点进行了评估。在阿必鲁肽组中,4731 名患者中有 338 名(7%)发生了主要复合结局,发生率为每 100 人年 4.6 例,在安慰剂组中,4732 名患者中有 428 名(9%)发生了主要复合结局,发生率为每 100 人年 5.9 例(风险比 0.78,95%CI 0.68-0.90),这表明阿必鲁肽优于安慰剂(非劣效性的 p<0.0001;优越性的 p=0.0006)。阿比鲁肽组发生急性胰腺炎(10 例)、胰腺癌(6 例)、甲状腺髓样癌(两组均无)和其他严重不良事件的发生率与安慰剂组无差异。安慰剂组有 3 例(<1%)死亡被研究者评估为与治疗相关,阿比鲁肽组有 2 例(<1%)死亡。
在患有 2 型糖尿病和心血管疾病的患者中,阿必鲁肽在主要不良心血管事件方面优于安慰剂。因此,基于证据的胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂应被视为降低 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件风险的综合策略的一部分。
葛兰素史克。