Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):857-862. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine our limb-related contemporary pediatric revascularization perioperative and follow-up outcomes after major blunt and penetrating trauma.
A retrospective review was performed of a prospectively maintained pediatric trauma database spanning January 2010 to December 2017 to capture all level I trauma activations that resulted in a peripheral arterial revascularization procedure. All preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative continuous variables are reported as a mean ± standard deviation; categorical variables are reported as a percentage of the population of interest.
During the study period, 1399 level I trauma activations occurred at a large-volume, urban children's hospital. The vascular surgery service was consulted in 2.6% (n = 36) of these cases for suspected vascular injury based on imaging or physical examination. Our study population included only patients who received an arterial revascularization, which was performed in 23 of the 36 consultations (1.6% of total traumas; median age, 11 years). These injuries were localized to the upper extremity in 60.9% (n = 14), lower extremity in 30.4% (n = 7), and neck in 8.7% (n = 2). The mean Injury Severity Score in the revascularized cohort was 14.0 (±7.6). Bone fractures were associated with 39.1% of the vascular injuries (90% of blunt injuries). Restoration of in-line flow was achieved by an endovascular solution in one patient and open surgery in the remainder, consisting of arterial bypass in 59.1% and direct repair in 40.9%. Within 30 days of the operation, we observed no deaths, no infections of the arterial reconstruction, and no major amputations. One patient required perioperative reintervention by the vascular team secondary to the development of a superficial seroma without evidence of graft involvement. Mean follow-up in our cohort was 43.3 (±35.4) months. During this phase, no additional deaths, amputations, chronic wounds, or limb length discrepancies were observed. All vascular repairs were patent, and all but one patient reported normal function of the affected limb at the latest clinic visit.
Traumatic peripheral vascular injury is rare in the pediatric population but is often observed secondary to a penetrating force or after long bone fracture. However, contemporary perioperative and long-term outcomes after surgical revascularization are excellent as demonstrated in this institutional case series.
本研究旨在确定我们在处理儿童严重钝器伤和穿透伤后肢体相关的当代血管重建术围手术期和随访结局。
对 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月前瞻性维护的儿童创伤数据库进行回顾性分析,以捕获所有导致外周动脉血运重建的 I 级创伤激活。所有术前、术中、术后连续变量均以平均值±标准差表示;分类变量以感兴趣人群的百分比表示。
在研究期间,一家大型城市儿童医院共进行了 1399 次 I 级创伤激活。根据影像学或体格检查,血管外科服务对其中 2.6%(n=36)的疑似血管损伤进行了会诊。我们的研究人群仅包括接受动脉血运重建的患者,在 36 次会诊中有 23 次(占总创伤的 1.6%;中位年龄 11 岁)进行了该治疗。这些损伤位于上肢的占 60.9%(n=14),下肢的占 30.4%(n=7),颈部的占 8.7%(n=2)。血管重建组的平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为 14.0(±7.6)。骨折与 39.1%的血管损伤相关(90%为钝器伤)。1 名患者通过血管内治疗成功恢复了直线血流,其余患者通过开放手术实现,其中动脉旁路术占 59.1%,直接修复术占 40.9%。术后 30 天内,我们观察到无死亡、动脉重建感染和主要截肢。1 名患者因手术团队在术后出现浅表性血清肿而需要再次干预,但没有证据表明移植物受累。我们的队列平均随访时间为 43.3(±35.4)个月。在此期间,没有发现其他死亡、截肢、慢性伤口或肢体长度差异。所有血管修复均通畅,除 1 名患者外,所有患者在最近的就诊时均报告受影响肢体功能正常。
儿童人群中创伤性外周血管损伤很少见,但通常是由穿透性力量引起的,或在长骨骨折后发生。然而,正如本机构病例系列所示,血管重建术后的当代围手术期和长期结局非常出色。