Suppr超能文献

低视力辅助器具对阅读无障碍的益处。

Benefits of low vision aids to reading accessibility.

作者信息

Latham Keziah

机构信息

Department of Vision & Hearing Sciences, and Vision & Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2018 Dec;153:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Abstract

The Reading Accessibility Index (ACC) has been proposed as a single-value reading parameter that can capture information on both reading speed and print sizes that can be read. It is defined as the average reading speed across a relevant range of print sizes (1.3-0.4logMAR), normalised by typical young-adult reading speed of 200 wpm, and with values typically in the range of 0-1. This study determines the impact of low vision aids (LVAs) on reading by evaluating ACC values for visually impaired observers reading both without and with an optical LVA. A secondary analysis of previously published data obtained from 100 visually impaired observers attending low vision assessments was undertaken. Observers had mixed causes of visual impairment but predominantly macular degeneration. All used an LVA for reading, with 88% using it 'often' or 'very often'. MNREAD reading parameters, including ACC, were determined both for reading without an LVA (clinical function) and with the LVA habitually used for reading (aided function). There was a significant improvement in ACC from clinical (0.31) to aided conditions (0.47). Average improvement in ACC with an LVA was 0.16, but the benefits of LVAs in terms of improvement in ACC could not be predicted from clinical visual function. Even with an LVA reading accessibility is, on average, markedly reduced from normal levels. The ACC is a potentially valuable outcome measure for reading rehabilitation interventions.

摘要

阅读可及性指数(ACC)已被提议作为一个单一值的阅读参数,它可以获取有关阅读速度和可读印刷字体大小的信息。它被定义为在相关印刷字体大小范围(1.3 - 0.4logMAR)内的平均阅读速度,通过典型的年轻成年人200字每分钟的阅读速度进行标准化,其值通常在0 - 1的范围内。本研究通过评估视力受损观察者在不使用和使用光学低视力辅助器具(LVA)时的ACC值,来确定低视力辅助器具对阅读的影响。对之前从100名参加低视力评估的视力受损观察者获得的已发表数据进行了二次分析。观察者的视力受损原因各不相同,但主要是黄斑变性。所有人都使用LVA进行阅读,其中88%的人“经常”或“非常经常”使用。确定了MNREAD阅读参数,包括ACC,分别用于不使用LVA时的阅读(临床功能)和习惯性使用的LVA时的阅读(辅助功能)。ACC从临床状态(0.31)到辅助状态(0.47)有显著改善。使用LVA时ACC的平均改善为0.16,但从临床视觉功能无法预测LVA在ACC改善方面的益处。即使使用LVA,阅读可及性平均仍明显低于正常水平。ACC是阅读康复干预的一个潜在有价值的结果指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验