Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Germany.
Zahnärzte am Bundesplatz Berlin, Bundesallee 55, Berlin, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 May;23(5):2303-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2698-1. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
Aim was to evaluate the impact of glass fiber versus titanium endodontic posts on the interproximal bone level around severely damaged endodontically treated teeth.
Thirty-eight participants of a randomized controlled trial on glass fiber (n = 18) and titanium post-endodontic restorations (n = 20) received radiographs at two different times after post placement (T0 = <12 months and T1 = 36-72 months after post placement). A total of 76 radiographs were analyzed with an image-editing software. Medians of changes in mesial and distal interproximal bone level (∆MBL, ∆DBL) were calculated and tested for statistical significance with respect to post material using Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05). Impact of post material on bone level changes was assessed in multilevel mixed-effect linear regression models.
The mean observation period was 54 months for glass fiber and 50 months for titanium posts. Interproximal bone loss was small in both groups during the study period with no significant differences between groups (glass-fiber group, ∆MBL = - 0.03 mm and ∆DBL = - 0.06 mm; titanium group, ∆MBL = - 0.07 mm and ∆DBL = - 0.17 mm; both p > 0.05). Overall, impact of post material on bone loss was almost negligible with a nonsignificant difference between materials of 0.10 mm during the entire study period.
The rigidity of endodontic post material has no impact on the level of alveolar bone support of severely damaged endodontically treated teeth.
Post-endodontic restorations of severely damaged teeth can achieve steady levels of periodontal bone support as a parameter of periodontal health, irrespective of post material.
评估玻璃纤维与钛金属根管桩对严重受损根管治疗后牙齿近中骨水平的影响。
38 名参与玻璃纤维(n=18)和钛金属根管桩修复随机对照试验的参与者,在桩放置后两个不同时间点(T0:<12 个月;T1:桩放置后 36-72 个月)拍摄 X 光片。使用图像编辑软件对 76 张 X 光片进行分析。计算近中和远中近中骨水平(∆MBL、∆DBL)的变化中位数,并使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验(p<0.05)比较不同桩材料的统计学意义。使用多级混合效应线性回归模型评估桩材料对骨水平变化的影响。
玻璃纤维组和钛金属组的平均观察期分别为 54 个月和 50 个月。研究期间,两组的近中骨丢失均较小,且组间无显著差异(玻璃纤维组,∆MBL=-0.03mm,∆DBL=-0.06mm;钛金属组,∆MBL=-0.07mm,∆DBL=-0.17mm;两者均 p>0.05)。总体而言,桩材料对骨丢失的影响几乎可以忽略不计,整个研究期间材料间差异为 0.10mm,无统计学意义。
根管桩材料的刚性对严重受损根管治疗后牙齿牙槽骨支持水平无影响。
严重受损牙齿的桩后修复可以达到稳定的牙周骨支持水平,作为牙周健康的参数,与桩材料无关。