University of Bath, UK.
Omega (Westport). 2020 Dec;82(2):175-195. doi: 10.1177/0030222818804646. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
The article analyses how potentially conflicting frames of grief and family operate in a number of English funerals. The data come from the 2010 Mass-Observation directive "Going to Funerals" which asked its panel of correspondents to write about the most recent funeral they had attended. In their writings, grief is displayed through conventional understandings of family. Drawing on Randall Collins, we show how the funeral stratifies mourners into family or nonfamily, a stratification accomplished-by family and nonfamily-through both outward display and inner feeling. The funerals described were more about a very traditional notion of family than about grief; family trumped grief, or at least provided the frame through which grief could be written about; and perceptions of "family" prompted emotions which in turn defined family. The funerals were portrayed as a distinct arena privileging family over the fluid and varied personal attachments highlighted in both the new sociology of personal life and in the concept of disenfranchised grief.
这篇文章分析了在一些英国葬礼中,悲伤和家庭的潜在冲突框架是如何运作的。数据来自于 2010 年大规模观察指令“参加葬礼”,该指令要求其通讯员小组撰写他们最近参加的葬礼。在他们的作品中,悲伤通过对家庭的传统理解表现出来。借鉴兰德尔·柯林斯的观点,我们展示了葬礼如何将哀悼者划分为家庭或非家庭,这种分层是通过家庭和非家庭通过外在表现和内在感受来实现的。所描述的葬礼更多的是关于一个非常传统的家庭观念,而不是悲伤;家庭胜过悲伤,或者至少提供了一个可以书写悲伤的框架;对“家庭”的看法引发了情感,而情感又定义了家庭。葬礼被描绘成一个独特的领域,将家庭置于个人生活新社会学和被剥夺权利的悲伤概念所强调的流动性和多样化的个人依恋之上。