Suppr超能文献

升主动脉、半弓和全弓修复对斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层患者早期及长期预后的影响

Impact of ascending aortic, hemiarch and arch repair on early and long-term outcomes in patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection.

作者信息

Merkle Julia, Sabashnikov Anton, Deppe Antje-Christin, Zeriouh Mohamed, Maier Johanna, Weber Carolyn, Eghbalzadeh Kaveh, Schlachtenberger Georg, Shostak Olga, Djordjevic Ilija, Kuhn Elmar, Rahmanian Parwis B, Madershahian Navid, Rustenbach Christian, Liakopoulos Oliver, Choi Yeong-Hoon, Kuhn-Régnier Ferdinand, Wahlers Thorsten

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Dec;12(12):327-340. doi: 10.1177/1753944718801568. Epub 2018 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Stanford A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening emergency associated with major morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of three different surgical approaches in patients with Stanford A AAD.

METHODS

: From January 2006 to March 2015 a total of 240 consecutive patients with diagnosed Stanford A AAD underwent elective, isolated surgical aortic repair in our centre. Patients were divided into three groups according to the extent of surgical repair: isolated replacement of the ascending aorta, hemiarch replacement and total arch replacement. Patients were followed up for up to 9 years. After univariate analysis multinomial logistic regression was performed for subgroup analysis. Baseline characteristics and endpoints as well as long-term survival were analysed.

RESULTS

: There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of demographics and preoperative baseline and clinical characteristics. Incidence of in-hospital stroke ( p = 0.034), need for reopening due to bleeding ( p = 0.031) and in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.017) increased significantly with the extent of the surgical approach. There was no statistical difference in terms of long-term survival ( p = 0.166) among the three groups. Applying multinomial logistic regression for subgroup analysis significantly higher odds for stroke ( p = 0.023), reopening for bleeding ( p = 0.010) and in-hospital mortality ( p = 0.009) for the arch surgery group in comparison to the ascending aorta surgery group as well as significantly higher odds for stroke ( p = 0.029) for the total arch surgery group in comparison to the hemiarch surgery group were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

: With Stanford A AAD the incidence of perioperative complications increased significantly with the extent of the surgical approach. Subgroup analysis and long-term follow up in patients undergoing isolated ascending or hemiarch surgery showed a lower incidence of cerebrovascular events compared with surgery for total arch replacement.

摘要

背景

斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层(AAD)是一种危及生命的急症,常伴有较高的发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在比较斯坦福A型AAD患者三种不同手术方式的治疗效果。

方法

2006年1月至2015年3月,共有240例连续诊断为斯坦福A型AAD的患者在本中心接受了择期、单纯性主动脉手术修复。根据手术修复范围将患者分为三组:升主动脉单纯置换、半弓置换和全弓置换。对患者进行了长达9年的随访。单因素分析后,进行多项逻辑回归以进行亚组分析。分析了基线特征、终点指标以及长期生存率。

结果

三组在人口统计学、术前基线和临床特征方面无统计学显著差异。随着手术范围的扩大,院内卒中发生率(p = 0.034)、因出血需要再次手术(p = 0.031)和院内死亡率(p = 0.017)显著增加。三组在长期生存率方面无统计学差异(p = 0.166)。应用多项逻辑回归进行亚组分析发现,与升主动脉手术组相比,弓部手术组发生卒中(p = 0.023)、因出血再次手术(p = 0.010)和院内死亡(p = 0.009)的几率显著更高,与半弓手术组相比,全弓手术组发生卒中(p = 0.029)的几率显著更高。

结论

对于斯坦福A型AAD,围手术期并发症的发生率随手术范围的扩大而显著增加。对接受单纯升主动脉或半弓手术的患者进行亚组分析和长期随访发现,与全弓置换手术相比,脑血管事件的发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验