Gong Ben-Fa, Lin Dong, Wei Hui, Wang Ying, Liu Bing-Cheng, Zhou Chun-Lin, Liu Kai-Qi, Wei Shu-Ning, Zhang Guang-Ji, Liu Yun-Tao, Gong Xiao-Yuan, Li Yan, Zhao Xing-Li, Qiu Shao-Wei, Gu Run-Xia, Mi Ying-Chang, Wang Jian-Xiang
Institute of Hematology & Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Tianjin 300020, China.
Institute of Hematology & Blood Disease Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Tianjin 300020, China.E-mail:
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Oct;26(5):1269-1274. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2018.05.003.
To evaluate the efficacy of primary prophylaxis of voriconazole against invasive infection of pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) during remission-induction chemotherapy (RIC) of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Clinical data of 102 de novo AML patients who received primary anti-IPA prophylaxis during the first induction chemotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. All the cases were divided into voriconazole-treated group and posaconazole-treated group according to the prophylactic agent. The incidences of IPA and systemic antifungal treatment during induction chemotherapy were analyzed for both groups.
Among 102 enrolled cases, 42 cases received voriconazole and other 60 received posaconazole as primary prophylaxis. IPA occurred in 3 cases of voriconazole group (1 probable, 2 possible); IPA occurred in 4 cases of posaconazose group, and all were possible cases. The incidence of IPA during remission-induction chemotherapy in variconazole group equaled to posaconazose group (7.1% vs. 6.7%) (P=0.925). Beside IPA cases, 2 cases in voriconazole group and 4 cases in posaconazole group received intravenous anti aspergillosis drugs preemptive treatment, and no significant difference of prophylactic success rate was observed between two groups (88.1% vs. 86.7%) (P=0.831). Visual disturbance was the most common adverse event occurred in voriconazole group, but no significant differences of incidences of other adverse effects were observed when compared with posaconazole group.
According to similar prophylactic effect with posaconazole, voriconazole appears to be a good alternative for primary prophylaxis of IPA during remission-induction chemotherapy in AML patients.
评估伏立康唑在急性髓系白血病(AML)患者缓解诱导化疗(RIC)期间对侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)进行一级预防的疗效。
回顾性分析102例在首次诱导化疗期间接受原发性抗IPA预防的初治AML患者的临床资料。所有病例根据预防用药分为伏立康唑治疗组和泊沙康唑治疗组。分析两组诱导化疗期间IPA的发生率和全身抗真菌治疗情况。
102例入组病例中,42例接受伏立康唑作为一级预防,60例接受泊沙康唑。伏立康唑组有3例发生IPA(1例很可能,2例可能);泊沙康唑组有4例发生IPA,均为可能病例。伏立康唑组缓解诱导化疗期间IPA的发生率与泊沙康唑组相当(7.1%对6.7%)(P=0.925)。除IPA病例外,伏立康唑组有2例、泊沙康唑组有4例接受了静脉抗曲霉病药物的抢先治疗,两组预防成功率无显著差异(88.1%对86.7%)(P=0.831)。视觉障碍是伏立康唑组最常见的不良事件,但与泊沙康唑组相比,其他不良反应的发生率无显著差异。
与泊沙康唑预防效果相似,伏立康唑似乎是AML患者缓解诱导化疗期间对IPA进行一级预防的良好替代药物。