Haroon Sabrina, Davenport Andrew
National University Hospital, UCL department of renal medicine, London, UK.
UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, UK.
Hemodial Int. 2018 Oct;22(S2):S65-S74. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12702. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
The objectives of hemodialysis have moved from the diffusive clearance of small molecular weight uremic toxins and achieving dialyzer urea adequacy targets to emphasis on improving clinical outcomes in end stage renal failure patients by increasing larger sized uremic toxin clearance. Clinical emphasis in the last few decades has focused on increasing middle molecule weight toxin clearance by hemodiafiltration. Although long-term data is still lacking, short-term outcomes appear promising. Advancements in nanotechnology have now introduction a new generation of medium cut-off membrane dialyzers which allow diffusive clearance of similar middle molecular weight uremia toxin clearance as hemodiafiltration, without increased albumin losses. As these dialyzers have only recently been introduced into clinical practice, no long-term outcomes are available to determine the relative benefits or advantages of this approach. As dialyzers are now designed to maximize diffusive or convective clearance, or provide a combination, then clinicians can now choose dialyzers tailored to the individual patient needs depending on clinical circumstances. We review the key important features in choosing a dialyzer for patients with end stage renal failure and acute kidney injury.
血液透析的目标已从清除小分子尿毒症毒素及实现透析器尿素充分性目标,转变为通过增加对更大分子量尿毒症毒素的清除来强调改善终末期肾衰竭患者的临床结局。在过去几十年中,临床重点一直是通过血液透析滤过来增加中分子量毒素的清除。尽管仍缺乏长期数据,但短期结果似乎很有前景。纳米技术的进步现已推出新一代中截留量膜透析器,其允许以与血液透析滤过相似的方式扩散清除中分子量尿毒症毒素,且不会增加白蛋白丢失。由于这些透析器最近才引入临床实践,目前尚无长期结果来确定这种方法的相对益处或优势。由于现在设计的透析器旨在最大限度地提高扩散或对流清除率,或提供两者结合的方式,临床医生现在可以根据临床情况选择适合个体患者需求的透析器。我们回顾了为终末期肾衰竭和急性肾损伤患者选择透析器的关键重要特征。