Sirakov Stanimir, Panayotova Adriana, Sirakov Alexander, Minkin Krasimir, Hristov Hristo
1 Radiology Department, UH St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
2 Neurosurgery Department, UH St Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Apr;25(2):139-143. doi: 10.1177/1591019918805151. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
Internal carotid artery (ICA) injury is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of skull base and neck surgery. Although usually manifested by massive intraoperative haemorrhage, impairment of the ICA might go unnoticed and result in formation of a pseudoaneurysm, causing delayed bleeding. Often additional complications are observed such as thrombosis, spasm, embolism or carotico-cavernous fistula formation. The risk of carotid artery injury in aggressive endonasal skull base surgical interventions ranges from 1% to 9%. Digital subtracted angiography remains the gold standard for evaluation of patients with iatrogenic carotid artery injury as it allows for endovascular treatment at the time of the procedure. Endovascular embolization is currently the preferred method for treating ICA pseudoaneurysms and a successful alternative to the surgical approach. Even though endovascular approaches are considered the safer option, delayed complications have been registered, such as endovascular coil extrusion and migration, which increases the risk of further episodes of bleeding. We present our experience with late coil extrusion in a patient who was previously treated with flow diverter stent and coiling for iatrogenic ICA pseudoaneurysm.
颈内动脉(ICA)损伤是颅底和颈部手术中一种罕见但可能危及生命的并发症。尽管通常表现为术中大量出血,但ICA的损伤可能未被察觉,并导致假性动脉瘤形成,引起延迟性出血。通常还会观察到其他并发症,如血栓形成、痉挛、栓塞或海绵窦瘘形成。在积极的鼻内镜颅底手术干预中,颈动脉损伤的风险为1%至9%。数字减影血管造影术仍然是评估医源性颈动脉损伤患者的金标准,因为它允许在手术过程中进行血管内治疗。血管内栓塞目前是治疗ICA假性动脉瘤的首选方法,也是手术方法的成功替代方案。尽管血管内方法被认为是更安全的选择,但已记录到延迟性并发症,如血管内线圈挤出和移位,这增加了进一步出血发作的风险。我们介绍了一名先前接受血流导向支架和线圈治疗医源性ICA假性动脉瘤的患者发生晚期线圈挤出的经验。