• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

50微米加100微米聚乙烯醇(PVA)颗粒与单纯100微米PVA颗粒前列腺动脉栓塞术临床结果的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization with 50-μm Plus 100-μm Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Particles versus 100-μm PVA Particles Alone: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Wang Mao Qiang, Zhang Jin Long, Xin Hai Nan, Yuan Kai, Yan Jieyu, Wang Yan, Zhang Guo Dong, Fu Jin Xin

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P.R. China.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1694-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.019
PMID:30297313
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using the combination of 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles versus 100-μm PVA particles alone in the treatment of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 5-year period, 120 patients treated with PAE for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH were randomized to undergo embolization with 50-μm plus 100-μm PVA particles (group A) or 100-μm PVA particles alone (group B). Mean follow-up time was 34 months (range, 12-57 mo). There were no differences between groups regarding baseline data. Primary outcome measurements included change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcome measurements included procedure-associated pain, prostate ischemia measured on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging 1 week after PAE, and changes over time in quality of life (QOL) questionnaire, peak urinary flow rate (Q), postvoid residual (PVR) volume, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were evaluated. Recurrence of LUTS following PAE was defined as relief of LUTS temporally but increased IPSS ≥ 8 or QOL score ≥ 3 or decrease in Q to < 7 mL/s.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up periods were 35 months ± 22 in group A and 33 months ± 25 in group B (P = .629). No differences between groups regarding procedural details, pain scores, or adverse events were noted (P > .05). At 24 month of follow-up, patients in group A had a greater decrease in mean IPSS (18.7 ± 12.5 vs 14.8 ± 13.5), QOL score (3.7 ± 1.5 vs 2.4 ± 1.8), Q (10.5 mL ± 9.5 vs 6.8 mL ± 5.0), PVR (92.0 mL ± 75.0 vs 60.0 mL ± 55.0), and PV (37.0 mL ± 19.5 vs 25.5 mL ± 15.0) compared with patients in group B (P < .05 for all). Mean ratios of prostate ischemic volume at 1 week after PAE were 70% ± 20 in group A and 41% ± 25 in group B (P = .021); mean PSA levels at 24 hour after PAE were 92.5 ng/mL ± 55.0 in group A and 77.5 ng/mL ± 45.0 in group B (P = .031); LUTS recurrence rates were 3.6% in group A and 14.6% in group B (P = .024). The mean IIEF-5 was not significantly different from baseline in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

PAE with 50-μm plus 100-μm PVA particles resulted in greater improvement in clinical and imaging outcomes and no significant differences in adverse events compared with 100-μm PVA particles alone.

摘要

目的

评估使用50μm和100μm聚乙烯醇(PVA)颗粒联合与单独使用100μm PVA颗粒进行前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)治疗有症状良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

在5年期间,120例因BPH继发下尿路症状(LUTS)接受PAE治疗的患者被随机分为接受50μm加100μm PVA颗粒栓塞(A组)或仅接受100μm PVA颗粒栓塞(B组)。平均随访时间为34个月(范围12 - 57个月)。两组基线数据无差异。主要结局指标包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)的变化和不良事件发生率。次要结局指标包括与手术相关的疼痛、PAE术后1周磁共振(MR)成像测量的前列腺缺血情况,以及生活质量(QOL)问卷、最大尿流率(Q)、排尿后残余尿量(PVR)、前列腺体积(PV)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平和国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)随时间的变化。PAE后LUTS复发定义为LUTS暂时缓解但IPSS增加≥8或QOL评分≥3或Q降至<7 mL/s。

结果

A组平均随访期为35个月±22,B组为33个月±25(P = 0.629)。两组在手术细节、疼痛评分或不良事件方面无差异(P>0.05)。在随访24个月时,与B组患者相比,A组患者的平均IPSS(18.7±12.5对14.8±13.5)、QOL评分(3.7±1.5对2.4±1.8)、Q(10.5 mL±9.5对6.8 mL±5.0)、PVR(92.0 mL±75.0对60.0 mL±55.0)和PV(37.0 mL±19.5对25.5 mL±15.0)下降幅度更大(所有P<0.05)。PAE术后1周前列腺缺血体积的平均比例A组为70%±20,B组为41%±25(P = 0.021);PAE术后24小时平均PSA水平A组为92.5 ng/mL±55.0,B组为77.5 ng/mL±45.0(P = 0.031);LUTS复发率A组为3.6%,B组为14.6%(P = 0.024)。两组平均IIEF - 5与基线相比无显著差异。

结论

与单独使用100μm PVA颗粒相比,使用50μm加100μm PVA颗粒进行PAE在临床和影像学结局方面有更大改善,且不良事件无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Prostatic Artery Embolization with 50-μm Plus 100-μm Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Particles versus 100-μm PVA Particles Alone: A Prospective Randomized Trial.50微米加100微米聚乙烯醇(PVA)颗粒与单纯100微米PVA颗粒前列腺动脉栓塞术临床结果的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1694-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
Does polyvinyl alcohol particle size change the outcome of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Results from a single-center randomized prospective study.聚乙烯醇颗粒大小会改变良性前列腺增生症前列腺动脉栓塞术的结果吗?一项单中心随机前瞻性研究的结果
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Nov;24(11):1595-602.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
3
Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative study of medium- and large-volume prostates.前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状:中、大体积前列腺的对比研究
BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):155-64. doi: 10.1111/bju.13147. Epub 2015 May 24.
4
Prostatic Arterial Embolization with Small Sized Particles for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Preliminary Results.使用小尺寸颗粒进行前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生所致下尿路症状:初步结果
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Aug 5;128(15):2072-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.161370.
5
Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of midterm follow-up from Chinese population.前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗因大体积(>80毫升)良性前列腺增生导致的下尿路症状:中国人群中期随访结果
BMC Urol. 2015 Apr 16;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0026-5.
6
Unilateral versus bilateral prostatic arterial embolization for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate enlargement.单侧与双侧前列腺动脉栓塞治疗前列腺增生患者下尿路症状。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Apr;36(2):403-11. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0528-4. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
7
Quality of life and clinical symptom improvement support prostatic artery embolization for patients with acute urinary retention caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.前列腺动脉栓塞术可改善良性前列腺增生所致急性尿潴留患者的生活质量和临床症状。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):535-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
8
Randomized Comparison of Prostatic Artery Embolization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.随机比较前列腺动脉栓塞术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jun;31(6):882-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.810. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia.前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗巨大前列腺增生引起的严重下尿路症状具有长期疗效。
BMC Urol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00726-y.
10
N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Nonspherical Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles For Prostatic Arterial Embolization To Treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Safety and Efficacy.丁氰基丙烯酸正丁酯胶与非球形聚乙烯醇颗粒用于前列腺动脉栓塞治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和疗效比较。
Urol J. 2023 Jul 26;20(4):261-268. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7734.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective observation of the early efficacy and safety of temperature-sensitive liquid embolic agent combined with polyvinyl alcohol microspheres for prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia.温度敏感型液体栓塞剂联合聚乙烯醇微球用于前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生所致下尿路症状的早期疗效及安全性回顾性观察
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):1847-1858. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-215. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Intentionally unilateral prostatic artery embolization: Patient selection, technique and potential benefits.选择性单侧前列腺动脉栓塞术:患者选择、技术及潜在益处
World J Radiol. 2024 Sep 28;16(9):380-388. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i9.380.
3
Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with Small Beads for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
使用小珠子进行前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 8;14(6):613. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060613.
4
Non-target embolic events during prostatic embolization with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH).使用乙烯-乙烯醇共聚物(EVOH)进行前列腺栓塞期间的非靶向栓塞事件。
CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Nov 3;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00402-w.
5
Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement.前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生相关下尿路症状。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Sep;24(9):427-441. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01170-9. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Prostatic Artery Embolization: An Update.前列腺动脉栓塞术:最新进展
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Apr;24(4):313-323. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0814. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Prostate Artery Embolization: Challenges, Tips, Tricks, and Perspectives.前列腺动脉栓塞术:挑战、技巧、窍门及展望
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 29;13(1):87. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010087.
8
Prostatic artery occlusion: initial findings on pathophysiological response in a canine prostate model.前列腺动脉闭塞:犬前列腺模型中病理生理反应的初步研究结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Dec;11(12):1655-1666. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-423.
9
Controversies in Prostate Artery Embolization: Future Best Practice.前列腺动脉栓塞术的争议:未来最佳实践
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Dec 20;39(6):562-570. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759701. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Nononcologic Embolization.非肿瘤性栓塞
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2022 Nov 17;39(4):416-420. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758077. eCollection 2022 Aug.