Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia.
Office of the Provost, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Dec;32(8):1015-1024. doi: 10.1037/fam0000472. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
This study examined associations between father involvement and father-child attachment security, and whether those associations differed as a function of timing (workday and nonworkday) and/or type (accessibility, caregiving, and play) of involvement. Eighty father-child dyads participated when children were approximately 3 years old. Fathers completed a time diary interview assessing the various forms of involvement, and attachment was assessed using the Attachment Q-Set (Waters, 1995) following 90 min of father-child observation in the home. On nonworkdays, father involvement in play predicted greater attachment security and involvement in caregiving was marginally associated with greater attachment security. On workdays, father involvement in caregiving was related to greater attachment security, whereas father involvement in play was related to less attachment security. Results were independent of observed paternal sensitivity and relevant demographic covariates. Findings highlight the differential impact of father involvement for the father-child attachment relationship depending on when involvement occurs and what types of activities fathers engage in. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了父亲参与度与父-子依恋安全性之间的关联,以及这些关联是否因参与的时间(工作日和非工作日)和/或类型(易接近性、照顾和游戏)而有所不同。当孩子大约 3 岁时,80 对父子参与了研究。父亲们完成了一份时间日记访谈,评估了各种形式的参与度,并且在家庭中进行了 90 分钟的父子观察后,使用依恋 Q-集(Waters,1995)评估了依恋。在非工作日,父亲在游戏中的参与度预测了更高的依恋安全性,而照顾方面的参与度与更高的依恋安全性略有相关。在工作日,父亲的照顾参与度与更高的依恋安全性有关,而父亲的游戏参与度与较低的依恋安全性有关。研究结果独立于观察到的父亲敏感性和相关的人口统计学协变量。研究结果强调了根据参与时间和父亲参与的活动类型,父亲参与度对父-子依恋关系的不同影响。(APA,2018 年,所有权利保留)。