a School of Medicine (Psychology) , University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia.
b Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia.
Child Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct;25(7):899-913. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2018.1531981. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
The aim of this study was to determine whether specific performance-based executive function assessment tools were associated with executive functioning in everyday life as reported by parents and teachers of four- to five-year-old preterm and term children. At the age of 4 years, 141 preterm children born <33 weeks' gestation and 77 term children were assessed using performance-based intelligence (WPPSI-III) and executive function (EF) assessment tools (NEPSY-II, Day-Night and Shape School tasks). The assessment results were compared with the parent and teacher completed questionnaires of EF (BRIEF-P) when the children started kindergarten at the age of 4 to 5 years. The performance-based intelligence and EF assessment results were not consistently associated with the parent and teacher reports of EF in everyday life for either preterm or term groups. Clinical implications of using and interpreting performance-based EF assessment tools and EF questionnaires are discussed with a particular focus on young preterm children at the commencement of formal schooling.
本研究旨在确定特定的基于表现的执行功能评估工具是否与父母和教师报告的 4 至 5 岁早产儿和足月儿童的日常生活中的执行功能有关。在 4 岁时,使用基于表现的智力(WPPSI-III)和执行功能(EF)评估工具(NEPSY-II、Day-Night 和 Shape School 任务)对 141 名出生时<33 周的早产儿和 77 名足月儿童进行了评估。当儿童在 4 至 5 岁开始上幼儿园时,将评估结果与父母和教师完成的 EF(BRIEF-P)问卷进行了比较。对于早产儿或足月组,基于表现的智力和 EF 评估结果与日常生活中父母和教师报告的 EF 并不始终相关。本文特别关注开始正式入学的年轻早产儿,讨论了使用和解释基于表现的 EF 评估工具和 EF 问卷的临床意义。