Suppr超能文献

单切口和双切口远端肱二头肌修复术中骨间后神经与皮质纽扣植入物的距离

Posterior Interosseous Nerve Proximity to Cortical Button Implant for Distal Biceps Repair With Single and 2-Incision Approaches.

作者信息

Strong Benjamin M, Voloshin Ilya

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jul;44(7):613.e1-613.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Fixation with a cortical button is the biomechanically strongest surgical approach for distal biceps repair, and utilization of the 2-incision approach may provide a more anatomical repair and improved terminal supination strength. The risk of injury to the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) associated with this approach requires further investigation.

METHODS

A distal biceps repair with a cortical button was performed on 10 cadavers, 5 utilizing the single-incision approach and 5 utilizing the 2-incision approach. Contrast was injected into the radial nerve and computed tomography scans were obtained. The distance between the drilled cortical perforation and the PIN was measured.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the cortical perforation to the PIN was not significantly different between approaches (9.4 mm and 8.8 mm). A PIN entrapment was seen in 0 out of 5 for the single-incision approach and 1 out of 5 for the 2-incision approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal biceps repair with cortical button fixation places the PIN at risk of injury regardless of the approach used. Methods of fixation that require bicortical drilling should be especially avoided when using the 2-incision approach.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Distal biceps repair utilizing bicortical drilling for fixation through a 2-incision approach poses high risk of injury to the PIN and should be avoided.

摘要

目的

使用皮质纽扣固定是肱二头肌远端修复生物力学上最强的手术方法,采用双切口入路可能提供更符合解剖结构的修复并提高终末旋后力量。与此入路相关的骨间后神经(PIN)损伤风险需要进一步研究。

方法

对10具尸体进行肱二头肌远端皮质纽扣固定修复,5例采用单切口入路,5例采用双切口入路。向桡神经内注入造影剂并进行计算机断层扫描。测量钻孔皮质穿孔与PIN之间的距离。

结果

两种入路从皮质穿孔到PIN的平均距离无显著差异(分别为9.4毫米和8.8毫米)。单切口入路5例中0例出现PIN卡压,双切口入路5例中有1例出现PIN卡压。

结论

无论采用何种入路,使用皮质纽扣固定进行肱二头肌远端修复均会使PIN面临损伤风险。采用双切口入路时,应特别避免需要双侧皮质钻孔的固定方法。临床意义:通过双切口入路使用双侧皮质钻孔进行肱二头肌远端修复对PIN造成损伤的风险很高,应予以避免。

相似文献

1
Posterior Interosseous Nerve Proximity to Cortical Button Implant for Distal Biceps Repair With Single and 2-Incision Approaches.
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jul;44(7):613.e1-613.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
3
Proximity of the posterior interosseous nerve during cortical button guidewire placement for distal biceps tendon reattachment.
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Mar;40(3):534-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.039. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
4
Use of a Bicortical Button to Safely Repair the Distal Biceps in a Two-Incision Approach: A Cadaveric Analysis.
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jul;42(7):570.e1-570.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
5
How to Avoid Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Single-Incision Distal Biceps Repair Drilling.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):424-431. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000534.
7
Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021 Oct 28;4(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.003. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Analysis of Complications in 784 Surgical Repairs.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3020-3029. doi: 10.1177/0363546517720200. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Effect of elbow flexion on the proximity of the PIN during 2-incision distal biceps repair.
Orthopedics. 2013 Jul;36(7):e931-5. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-25.
10
Safe Drill Trajectory for Anatomic Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Through a Single Incision: A Cadaveric Study.
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Nov;48(11):1160.e1-1160.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验