Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Med Educ. 2018 Dec;52(12):1288-1298. doi: 10.1111/medu.13686. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Time pressure has been implicated in the suboptimal diagnostic performance of doctors and in increases in diagnostic errors. However, the reasons underlying these effects are not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of time pressure on physicians' diagnostic accuracy and to explore the mediating effects of perceived stress (emotional pathway) and number of plausible diagnostic hypotheses (cognitive pathway) on the proposed relationship.
We conducted a randomised controlled experiment. A total of 75 senior internal medicine residents completed eight written clinical cases under conditions with (n = 40) or without (n = 35) time pressure. They were then asked to: (i) rate the overall stress experienced, and (ii) write down any alternative hypotheses they had thought of when diagnosing the cases. In a post hoc analysis, a mediation path analysis was performed to test the causal relationships between time pressure, perceived stress and number of alternative diagnoses.
Participants who were under time pressure spent less time diagnosing the cases (85.54 seconds versus 181.81 seconds; p< 0.001) and had a lower mean diagnostic accuracy score (0.44 versus 0.53; p = 0.01). In addition, they reported more stress (5.80 versus 4.69; p = 0.01) and generated fewer plausible tentative hypotheses (0.37 versus 0.51; p = 0.01). Two path coefficients were found to be statistically significant; the first path coefficient referred to the relationship between time pressure and perceived stress (standardised β = 0.25, p = 0.029), and the second negative path coefficient referred to the relationship between time pressure and number of plausible alternative hypotheses (standardised β = -0.32, p< 0.01).
Time pressure adversely influences physicians' diagnostic accuracy by increasing their stress response and reducing the number of plausible hypotheses as mediators.
时间压力与医生诊断表现不佳和诊断错误增加有关。然而,这些影响的原因尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨时间压力对医生诊断准确性的影响,并探讨感知压力(情绪途径)和合理诊断假设数量(认知途径)对拟议关系的中介作用。
我们进行了一项随机对照实验。共有 75 名高级内科住院医师在有(n=40)或没有(n=35)时间压力的情况下完成了 8 个书面临床病例。然后,他们被要求:(i)评估他们经历的总体压力,(ii)写下他们在诊断病例时想到的任何替代假设。在事后分析中,进行中介路径分析以检验时间压力、感知压力和替代诊断数量之间的因果关系。
有时间压力的参与者诊断病例的时间较少(85.54 秒对 181.81 秒;p<0.001),平均诊断准确性评分较低(0.44 对 0.53;p=0.01)。此外,他们报告的压力更大(5.80 对 4.69;p=0.01),产生的合理临时假设更少(0.37 对 0.51;p=0.01)。有两个路径系数具有统计学意义;第一个路径系数是指时间压力与感知压力之间的关系(标准化β=0.25,p=0.029),第二个负路径系数是指时间压力与合理替代假设数量之间的关系(标准化β=-0.32,p<0.01)。
时间压力通过增加压力反应和减少合理假设数量作为中介,对医生的诊断准确性产生不利影响。