Suppr超能文献

临床推理学习的障碍:对医学见习生的定性研究

Barriers to Learning Clinical Reasoning: a Qualitative Study of Medicine Clerkship Students.

作者信息

Duca Nicholas, Adams Nancy, Glod Susan, Haidet Paul

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive H034, Hershey, PA 17033 USA.

Harrell Health Sciences Library, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 26;30(4):1495-1502. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01069-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is crucial to good patient care, but both learning and applying clinical reasoning skills in the context of a complex working environment can be challenging. We sought to understand the perceived barriers to learning clinical reasoning, as experienced by internal medicine clerkship students at our institution. We invited internal medicine clerkship students to participate in focus groups to discuss their experiences with and barriers to learning clinical reasoning. A survey was administered to gather additional responses. Responses were reviewed, coded, and synthesized to identify key themes. Twenty-nine medicine clerkship students (male = 14, female = 15) participated in six 60-minute focus groups, and 121 (61% response rate) students responded to the barriers to clinical reasoning survey from March 2018 to May 2019. We identified three themes (clerkship acclimation, data access, and practice optimization) and ten subthemes as aspects of the clerkship environment that impacted students' ability to develop clinical reasoning skills. Students identified barriers to learning clinical reasoning during the internal medicine clerkship. The themes "clerkship acclimation" and "data access" were identified as prerequisites to clinical reasoning while the theme "practice optimization" described key components of the deliberate practice of clinical reasoning. Educators and health systems may improve the development of clinical reasoning by recognizing and overcoming these barriers within clinical learning environments.

摘要

临床推理对于优质的患者护理至关重要,但在复杂的工作环境中学习和应用临床推理技能都可能具有挑战性。我们试图了解我校内科实习学生所感受到的学习临床推理的障碍。我们邀请内科实习学生参加焦点小组,讨论他们学习临床推理的经历和障碍。进行了一项调查以收集更多反馈。对反馈进行了审查、编码和综合,以确定关键主题。29名内科实习学生(男性14名,女性15名)参加了6个60分钟的焦点小组,121名学生(回复率61%)对2018年3月至2019年5月的临床推理障碍调查做出了回应。我们确定了三个主题(实习适应、数据获取和实践优化)以及十个子主题,作为实习环境中影响学生培养临床推理技能能力的方面。学生们指出了内科实习期间学习临床推理的障碍。“实习适应”和“数据获取”主题被确定为临床推理的先决条件,而“实践优化”主题描述了临床推理刻意练习的关键组成部分。教育工作者和卫生系统可以通过认识并克服临床学习环境中的这些障碍来促进临床推理的发展。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Learning Clinical Reasoning: a Qualitative Study of Medicine Clerkship Students.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 26;30(4):1495-1502. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01069-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Gathering Validity Evidence on an Internal Medicine Clerkship Multistep Exam to Assess Medical Student Analytic Ability.
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-35. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1749635. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
6
General practitioners' and students' experiences with feedback during a six-week clerkship in general practice: a qualitative study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;34(2):172-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2016.1160633. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
7
Self-efficacy beliefs and expectations during an Emergency Medicine Clerkship.
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 22;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00406-0.
9
Learning in a High-Stress Clinical Environment: Stressors Associated with Medical Students' Clerkship Training on Labor and Delivery.
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;31(4):385-392. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1575742. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
10
Students' Surgical Experiences in a Distributed Model of Clinical Education: A Mixed-Methods Sequential Case Study.
J Surg Educ. 2021 May-Jun;78(3):858-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

2
Does online case-based learning foster clinical reasoning skills? A mixed-methods study.
Future Healthc J. 2024 Nov 13;12(1):100210. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100210. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Diagnosis education - an emerging field.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Jun 26;6(2):75-77. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0029.
3
Assessing Clinical Reasoning: Targeting the Higher Levels of the Pyramid.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1631-1636. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04953-4.
4
Nested Domains: A Global Conceptual Model for Optimizing the Clinical Learning Environment.
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):886-891. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Student experiences of learning clinical reasoning.
Clin Teach. 2020 Feb;17(1):52-57. doi: 10.1111/tct.13014. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
8
Comfort with uncertainty: reframing our conceptions of how clinicians navigate complex clinical situations.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;24(4):797-809. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9859-5. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
9
Medical Student Use of Electronic and Paper Health Records During Inpatient Clinical Clerkships: Results of a National Longitudinal Study.
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S14-S20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002376.
10
Factors underlying suboptimal diagnostic performance in physicians under time pressure.
Med Educ. 2018 Dec;52(12):1288-1298. doi: 10.1111/medu.13686. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验