Duca Nicholas, Adams Nancy, Glod Susan, Haidet Paul
Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive H034, Hershey, PA 17033 USA.
Harrell Health Sciences Library, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 26;30(4):1495-1502. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01069-x. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Clinical reasoning is crucial to good patient care, but both learning and applying clinical reasoning skills in the context of a complex working environment can be challenging. We sought to understand the perceived barriers to learning clinical reasoning, as experienced by internal medicine clerkship students at our institution. We invited internal medicine clerkship students to participate in focus groups to discuss their experiences with and barriers to learning clinical reasoning. A survey was administered to gather additional responses. Responses were reviewed, coded, and synthesized to identify key themes. Twenty-nine medicine clerkship students (male = 14, female = 15) participated in six 60-minute focus groups, and 121 (61% response rate) students responded to the barriers to clinical reasoning survey from March 2018 to May 2019. We identified three themes (clerkship acclimation, data access, and practice optimization) and ten subthemes as aspects of the clerkship environment that impacted students' ability to develop clinical reasoning skills. Students identified barriers to learning clinical reasoning during the internal medicine clerkship. The themes "clerkship acclimation" and "data access" were identified as prerequisites to clinical reasoning while the theme "practice optimization" described key components of the deliberate practice of clinical reasoning. Educators and health systems may improve the development of clinical reasoning by recognizing and overcoming these barriers within clinical learning environments.
临床推理对于优质的患者护理至关重要,但在复杂的工作环境中学习和应用临床推理技能都可能具有挑战性。我们试图了解我校内科实习学生所感受到的学习临床推理的障碍。我们邀请内科实习学生参加焦点小组,讨论他们学习临床推理的经历和障碍。进行了一项调查以收集更多反馈。对反馈进行了审查、编码和综合,以确定关键主题。29名内科实习学生(男性14名,女性15名)参加了6个60分钟的焦点小组,121名学生(回复率61%)对2018年3月至2019年5月的临床推理障碍调查做出了回应。我们确定了三个主题(实习适应、数据获取和实践优化)以及十个子主题,作为实习环境中影响学生培养临床推理技能能力的方面。学生们指出了内科实习期间学习临床推理的障碍。“实习适应”和“数据获取”主题被确定为临床推理的先决条件,而“实践优化”主题描述了临床推理刻意练习的关键组成部分。教育工作者和卫生系统可以通过认识并克服临床学习环境中的这些障碍来促进临床推理的发展。