Goggs Robert, Mastrocco Alicia, Brooks Marjory B
Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, 14853.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2018 Nov;28(6):541-550. doi: 10.1111/vec.12777. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
The clinical diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in dogs is challenging. It was hypothesized that dogs with laboratory abnormalities consistent with overt DIC have increased mortality and hence survival could be used to evaluate the performance of DIC scoring systems. Four DIC scoring systems were compared in clinically ill dogs: The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) score; a previously published veterinary DIC score; a system using in-house reference intervals (RIs) for coagulation assays; and the published veterinary DIC score modified by use of in-house RI values.
Retrospective cohort study.
University teaching hospital.
Eight hundred four client-owned dogs with underlying disorders associated with DIC.
None.
Medical records were reviewed to identify dogs for which a coagulation panel consisting of coagulation times, D-dimer concentration, antithrombin activity, fibrinogen concentration, and platelet count had been analyzed. Four methods for overt DIC scoring were then applied, and the ability of these scores to predict mortality was evaluated. Use of institution RIs for diagnosis of overt DIC provided the most accurate prognostic assessment. A score based on abnormalities in 3 of 6 parameters to identify overt DIC was 72.7% sensitive and 80.9% specific for mortality and was accurate in 78.4% of cases. The mortality rate of dogs diagnosed with overt DIC via this method was 62.5%, compared to 12.9% in the dogs not in overt DIC, a relative risk of nonsurvival of 4.84 (95% confidence interval 3.80-6.16).
In dogs at-risk for DIC, an in-house RI scoring system accurately predicted mortality. With further prospective validation, this system holds promise as a diagnostic tool for consistent characterization of overt DIC in clinical studies and clinical practice.
犬弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)的临床诊断具有挑战性。据推测,实验室检查结果符合显性DIC的犬死亡率会升高,因此生存率可用于评估DIC评分系统的性能。本研究对4种DIC评分系统在临床患病犬中进行了比较:国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)评分;先前发表的兽医DIC评分;使用凝血检测内部参考区间(RI)的系统;以及采用内部RI值修改后的已发表兽医DIC评分。
回顾性队列研究。
大学教学医院。
804只患有与DIC相关基础疾病的客户拥有犬。
无。
查阅病历以确定已分析了包括凝血时间、D - 二聚体浓度、抗凝血酶活性、纤维蛋白原浓度和血小板计数在内的凝血指标的犬。然后应用4种显性DIC评分方法,并评估这些评分预测死亡率的能力。使用机构RI诊断显性DIC可提供最准确的预后评估。基于6项参数中的3项异常来识别显性DIC的评分对死亡率的敏感性为72.7%,特异性为80.9%,在78.4%的病例中诊断准确。通过该方法诊断为显性DIC的犬的死亡率为62.5%,而未患显性DIC的犬的死亡率为12.9%,非生存相对风险为4.84(95%置信区间3.80 - 6.16)。
在有DIC风险的犬中,内部RI评分系统能准确预测死亡率。经过进一步的前瞻性验证,该系统有望成为临床研究和临床实践中用于一致表征显性DIC的诊断工具。