• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期成本比较:良性前列腺增生的手术治疗与药物治疗——基于医院计费数据的研究。

Long-term cost comparison between surgical and medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study using hospital billing data.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5A):E79-E85. doi: 10.1111/bju.14584. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1111/bju.14584
PMID:30303597
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse actual long-term medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and compare the incurred cost with that of patients with BPH who underwent early surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who were first diagnosed with BPH from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2010 were identified using the Clinical Data Warehouse. Hospital billing data generated by the electronic hospital management system were collected until December 2015. For outpatient care, only procedures, materials and drugs directly related to the management of BPH were selected for the analysis. For inpatient care, all procedures, materials and drugs ordered on dates with continuity with BPH surgery date were included. The primary endpoint of the study was the total treatment-related direct costs of patients undergoing a long-term curative medical therapy for BPH (Group 1), which was arbitrarily defined as any medical therapy including a 5α-reductase inhibitor with a minimum medication possession ratio of 0.5 during ≥5 consecutive years, or ≥1 year until BPH surgery due to medical therapy failure. In all, 70 patients who underwent BPH surgery at <1 year of initial visit served as controls (Group 2).

RESULTS

Amongst 137 patients in the Group 1, four patients underwent BPH surgery at a median of 57.8 months after the initial visit (2.9%). At a median follow-up of 76 months, the mean total treatment cost was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 ($3987 vs $3036 [USA dollars], P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean 'out-of-pocket' cost was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 ($1742 vs $1436, P = 0.005). When a linear increment of annual BPH treatment cost is assumed for Group 1 and all costs are assumed to be produced within the first year for Group 2, the total and out-of-pocket costs became equal at the end of the fifth year of medical treatment. For both total and out-of-pocket costs, medication-related costs occupied the largest proportion, exceeding half of the costs.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest patient counselling at the beginning of BPH treatment should include the likelihood that the cumulative out-of-pocket cost at 5 years of continuous medication will exceed that of early surgery. Our cost study using hospital billing data extractable from the electronic hospital management system may be a good model for cost studies that could provide valuable information to health providers and payers.

摘要

目的

分析良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的实际长期治疗情况,并将其与早期手术患者的治疗费用进行比较。

方法

使用临床数据仓库,确定 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间首次被诊断为 BPH 的患者。从电子医院管理系统生成的医院计费数据中收集了截至 2015 年 12 月的信息。对于门诊护理,仅选择与 BPH 管理直接相关的程序、材料和药物进行分析。对于住院护理,包括与 BPH 手术日期具有连续性的日期内所有开列的程序、材料和药物。本研究的主要终点是接受 BPH 长期治疗的患者的总治疗相关直接费用(第 1 组),这是任意定义的,包括至少 5 年连续服用 5α-还原酶抑制剂,且药物维持率至少为 0.5,或由于治疗失败而在首次就诊后 1 年内进行至少 1 年的 BPH 手术。共有 70 名在首次就诊后 <1 年内接受 BPH 手术的患者作为对照组(第 2 组)。

结果

在第 1 组的 137 名患者中,4 名患者在首次就诊后中位数为 57.8 个月(2.9%)时接受了 BPH 手术。在中位数为 76 个月的随访中,第 1 组的平均总治疗费用明显高于第 2 组(3987 美元比 3036 美元[美元],P<0.001)。同样,第 1 组的平均“自付”费用也明显高于第 2 组(1742 美元比 1436 美元,P=0.005)。假设第 1 组的 BPH 治疗年度成本呈线性递增,并且假设第 2 组的所有成本都在第一年产生,则第 1 组和第 2 组的总自付成本在医疗治疗的第五年末达到相等。对于总费用和自付费用,药物相关费用占比最大,超过一半的费用。

结论

我们建议在开始 BPH 治疗时向患者提供咨询,告知他们持续服药 5 年的累计自付费用可能超过早期手术的费用。我们使用可从电子医院管理系统中提取的医院计费数据进行的成本研究可能是成本研究的良好模型,可为医疗服务提供者和支付方提供有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
Long-term cost comparison between surgical and medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study using hospital billing data.长期成本比较:良性前列腺增生的手术治疗与药物治疗——基于医院计费数据的研究。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5A):E79-E85. doi: 10.1111/bju.14584. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
2
Clinical progression, acute urinary retention, prostate-related surgeries, and costs in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia taking early versus delayed combination 5α-reductase inhibitor therapy and α-blocker therapy: a retrospective analysis.患有良性前列腺增生的患者接受早期与延迟联合 5α-还原酶抑制剂治疗和 α-受体阻滞剂治疗的临床进展、急性尿潴留、前列腺相关手术和费用:回顾性分析。
Clin Ther. 2013 May;35(5):624-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
3
Pharmacotherapy vs surgery as initial therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe benign prostate hyperplasia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.药物治疗与手术作为中重度良性前列腺增生患者的初始治疗选择:成本效益分析。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):879-888. doi: 10.1111/bju.14520. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
4
Establishing the clinical and economic benefits of adherence to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an assessment of Medicare and Medicaid patients.评估医疗补助和医疗保险患者中,5-α还原酶抑制剂在良性前列腺增生中的依从性的临床和经济效益。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;13(18):2593-600. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.744821. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
5
Terazosin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in benign prostatic hyperplasia.特拉唑嗪。对其用于良性前列腺增生症的药物经济学评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Feb;11(2):184-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711020-00008.
6
Cost effectiveness comparison of dutasteride and finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia--The Markov model based on data from Montenegro.度他雄胺和非那雄胺治疗良性前列腺增生症患者的成本效益比较——基于黑山数据的马尔可夫模型
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 Jan;73(1):26-33. doi: 10.2298/vsp141024129d.
7
The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生症治疗的长期成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(2):171-91. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624020-00006.
8
Comparison of Characteristics of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Patients Treated with Finasteride and Alpha Blocker Combination Therapy Versus Alpha Blocker Monotherapy in China: An Analysis of Electronic Medical Record Data.中国接受非那雄胺与α受体阻滞剂联合治疗与单独接受α受体阻滞剂治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的特征比较:电子病历数据分析。
Adv Ther. 2018 Aug;35(8):1191-1198. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0748-3. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study.药物治疗对良性前列腺增生相关下尿路症状患者的药物依从性和临床结局:基于人群的队列研究。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
A cost density analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生的成本密度分析
Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):993-1004. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80055-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Standard approach and future perspective for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia from a health-economics point of view: the role of transperineal laser ablation.从卫生经济学角度看良性前列腺增生管理的标准方法与未来展望:经会阴激光消融术的作用
Front Urol. 2023 Feb 24;3:1100386. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1100386. eCollection 2023.
2
A flexible cystoscopy device prototype for mechanical tissue ablation based on micro-scale hydrodynamic cavitation: Ex vivo and in vivo studies.一种基于微尺度液力空化的用于机械组织消融的柔性膀胱镜设备原型:离体和体内研究。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2025 Mar;114:107223. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107223. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
3
A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing Rezūm with transurethral needle ablation and microwave thermotherapy for the management of enlarged prostate.
一项系统评价和网状Meta分析,比较Rezūm与经尿道针刺消融术和微波热疗在治疗前列腺增生方面的效果。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Apr 29;5(7):621-635. doi: 10.1002/bco2.361. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Is Early Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Preferable to Prolonged Medical Therapy: Pros and Cons.良性前列腺增生的早期手术治疗相较于长期药物治疗是否更可取:利弊分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 9;57(4):368. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040368.
5
Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生症管理的流行病学与治疗方式
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Oct;8(5):529-539. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.01.