• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续的放射科医生专业实践评估:简化复杂流程的策略和工具。

Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of Radiologists: Strategies and Tools for Simplifying a Complex Process.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Rd, Boston, MA 02215.

出版信息

Radiographics. 2018 Oct;38(6):1593-1608. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180163.

DOI:10.1148/rg.2018180163
PMID:30303807
Abstract

The Joint Commission, our major accreditation organization, requires that all physicians who have been granted privileges at an organization must undergo evaluation of and collect data relating to their performance, to make the decisions of privileging more objective and continuous by that organization. For radiologists, this so-called ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) can be assessed by using the six general core competencies. These competencies were initially developed for graduate medical education and defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and have now been expanded to provide a general framework for defining categories of data to be collected in assessing the performance of practicing radiologists. Within each core competency, various radiology-relevant metrics exist that can be measured to fulfill the OPPE requirements. Each radiology department can determine the specific type of data to be collected, including determining what items are defined as acceptable performance metrics, what data or outcomes require further monitoring, and what specific data or data trends would trigger the need for an additional focused and more thorough professional practice evaluation, also known as a focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE). RSNA, 2018.

摘要

我们的主要认证机构——联合委员会要求,所有在医疗机构获得特权的医生都必须接受其绩效评估和数据收集,以便该机构做出更客观和持续的授权决策。对于放射科医生来说,这种所谓的持续专业实践评估 (OPPE) 可以使用六个通用核心能力来评估。这些能力最初是为研究生医学教育开发的,并由研究生医学教育认证委员会定义,现在已经扩展到为定义评估执业放射科医生绩效时要收集的数据类别提供一个通用框架。在每个核心能力中,都存在各种与放射学相关的指标,可以进行衡量以满足 OPPE 的要求。每个放射科都可以确定要收集的具体数据类型,包括确定哪些项目被定义为可接受的绩效指标、哪些数据或结果需要进一步监测以及哪些特定数据或数据趋势将触发需要进行额外的集中和更彻底的专业实践评估,也称为集中专业实践评估 (FPPE)。RSNA,2018 年。

相似文献

1
Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation of Radiologists: Strategies and Tools for Simplifying a Complex Process.持续的放射科医生专业实践评估:简化复杂流程的策略和工具。
Radiographics. 2018 Oct;38(6):1593-1608. doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180163.
2
Assessing physician competency: an update on the joint commission requirement for ongoing and focused professional practice evaluation.评估医师能力:联合委员会对持续和重点专业实践评估的最新要求。
Adv Anat Pathol. 2012 Nov;19(6):388-400. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0b013e318273f97e.
3
Focused Professional Performance Evaluation of a Radiologist--a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Joint Commission Requirement.放射科医生的专项专业绩效评估——医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心及联合委员会的要求
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):87-93. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
4
Familiarity with current practices of granting and maintaining privileges in pediatric interventional radiology--a worldwide survey of the members of the Society for Pediatric Interventional Radiology (SPIR).熟悉儿科介入放射学中授予和维持特权的现行做法——对儿科介入放射学会(SPIR)成员的一项全球性调查。
Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Nov;42(11):1316-21. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2456-5. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
5
The joint commission practice performance evaluation: a primer for radiologists.联合委员会实践绩效评估:放射科医生入门。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Jun;7(6):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.01.027.
6
Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 joint commission standards.基于绩效的放射科医生评估:依据2007年联合委员会标准促进改进。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Oct;4(10):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.007.
7
A Guide to Performance Evaluation for the Intensivist: Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation in the ICU.《危重病医师绩效评估指南:ICU 中的持续专业实践评估和重点专业实践评估》。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1521-1527. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004441.
8
Privileging and credentialing for interventional cardiology procedures.介入心脏病学手术的特权授予与资质认定
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86(4):655-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25793. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
9
Quality initiatives: measuring and managing the procedural competency of radiologists.质量倡议:衡量和管理放射科医生的程序能力。
Radiographics. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):1477-88. doi: 10.1148/rg.315105242. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
10
College of American Pathologists considerations for the delineation of pathology clinical privileges.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Apr;133(4):613-8. doi: 10.5858/133.4.613.

引用本文的文献

1
A 360-degree evaluation of the professionalism and communication skills of technologists working in the radiology department of a public sector tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.对巴基斯坦卡拉奇一家公立医院放射科技术人员的专业精神和沟通技巧进行 360 度评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):1176. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06045-2.
2
Severe pain management in the emergency department: patient pathway as a new factor associated with IV morphine prescription.急诊科的剧烈疼痛管理:患者路径是与 IV 吗啡处方相关的新因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;12:1352833. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352833. eCollection 2024.
3
Peer learning in abdominal radiology: iterative process improvements over a 20-year experience.
腹部放射学中的同伴学习:20 年经验的迭代过程改进。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Feb;49(2):662-677. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04118-2. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Value-assessment of computer-assisted navigation strategies during percutaneous needle placement.计算机辅助导航策略在经皮穿刺针放置中的价值评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1775-1785. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02719-8. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
5
Bedside Evaluation of Early VAS/NRS Based Protocols for Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department: Reasons for Poor Follow-Up and Targeted Practices.急诊科基于早期视觉模拟评分法/数字评定量表的静脉注射吗啡方案的床边评估:随访不佳的原因及针对性措施
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 29;10(21):5089. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215089.