Silva V L, Mallmann I T, Graeff V, Schmitt J L, Mehltreter K
Laboratório de Botânica, Universidade Feevale, ERS-239, 2755, CEP 93525-075, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brasil.
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Red de Ecología Funcional, Carretera antigua a Coatepec-351, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Braz J Biol. 2019 Jul-Sep;79(3):495-504. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.186077. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
Forest edges typically exhibit higher luminosity and lower humidity than the forest interior, resulting in an abiotic gradient. However, the degree of abiotic difference can be affected from the type of the matrix, influencing the selection of species. We compared the floristic and phytosociological structure of understory communities of ferns and lycophytes of the edge and interior of three forest sites influenced by different types of surrounding matrices (natural field, Pinus plantation, and cultivation of crops). In the region of Araucaria Forest, in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, twelve 10 × 10 m plots were selected at the edge and interior of each site, totaling 72 plots and to evaluate the phytosociological contrast, using as a parameter coverage and species richness per plot to evaluate this contrast. We recorded a total of 38 species in the studied areas, distributed in 15 families. The results show that the edge effect acts at different intensities in the analyzed sites. In the site with unnatural matrix, the composition was more homogeneous both in the edges and in the interiors and presented lower richness, showing a more pronounced and deep impact. Already in the site with natural matrix surroundings, although the border also presents low richness, the interior was about 3x richer. Based on our results, we concluded that fern conservation efforts should focus on fragments of Araucaria Forest inserted in the natural field, because the conversion of natural field into Pinus planting and cultivation of crops decreases ferns species both in the edges and forest interiors of the studied fragments, besides altering the phytosociological structure leading the communities to simplification.
森林边缘通常比森林内部具有更高的光照度和更低的湿度,从而形成一种非生物梯度。然而,非生物差异的程度会受到基质类型的影响,进而影响物种的选择。我们比较了受不同类型周边基质(天然田地、松树种植园和农作物种植)影响的三个森林地点边缘和内部蕨类植物和石松类植物林下群落的植物区系和植物社会学结构。在巴西南里奥格兰德州的南洋杉森林地区,在每个地点的边缘和内部各选取了12个10×10米的样地,共计72个样地,并以每个样地的覆盖度和物种丰富度作为参数来评估植物社会学差异,以评估这种差异。我们在研究区域共记录了38个物种,分布在15个科中。结果表明,边缘效应在分析的地点以不同强度起作用。在具有非自然基质的地点,边缘和内部的组成更为均匀,物种丰富度较低,显示出更明显和深刻的影响。而在周边为天然基质的地点,虽然边缘的物种丰富度也较低,但内部的物种丰富度约为边缘的3倍。根据我们的结果,我们得出结论,蕨类植物的保护工作应集中在插入天然田地中的南洋杉森林片段上,因为将天然田地转变为松树种植园和农作物种植不仅会减少研究片段边缘和森林内部的蕨类植物物种,还会改变植物社会学结构,导致群落简化。