Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
JAMA. 2018 Oct 9;320(14):1455-1463. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14618.
Polymyxin B hemoperfusion reduces blood endotoxin levels in sepsis. Endotoxin activity can be measured in blood with a rapid assay. Treating patients with septic shock and elevated endotoxin activity using polymyxin B hemoperfusion may improve clinical outcomes.
To test whether adding polymyxin B hemoperfusion to conventional medical therapy improves survival compared with conventional therapy alone among patients with septic shock and high endotoxin activity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 450 adult critically ill patients with septic shock and an endotoxin activity assay level of 0.60 or higher enrolled between September 2010 and June 2016 at 55 tertiary hospitals in North America. Last follow-up was June 2017.
Two polymyxin B hemoperfusion treatments (90-120 minutes) plus standard therapy completed within 24 hours of enrollment (n = 224 patients) or sham hemoperfusion plus standard therapy (n = 226 patients).
The primary outcome was mortality at 28 days among all patients randomized (all participants) and among patients randomized with a multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) of more than 9.
Among 450 eligible enrolled patients (mean age, 59.8 years; 177 [39.3%] women; mean APACHE II score 29.4 [range, 0-71 with higher scores indicating greater severity), 449 (99.8%) completed the study. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion was not associated with a significant difference in mortality at 28 days among all participants (treatment group, 84 of 223 [37.7%] vs sham group 78 of 226 [34.5%]; risk difference [RD], 3.2%; 95% CI, -5.7% to 12.0%; relative risk [RR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.85-1.39; P = .49) or in the population with a MODS of more than 9 (treatment group, 65 of 146 [44.5%] vs sham, 65 of 148 [43.9%]; RD, 0.6%; 95% CI, -10.8% to 11.9%; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78-1.31; P = .92). Overall, 264 serious adverse events were reported (65.1% treatment group vs 57.3% sham group). The most frequent serious adverse events were worsening of sepsis (10.8% treatment group vs 9.1% sham group) and worsening of septic shock (6.6% treatment group vs 7.7% sham group).
Among patients with septic shock and high endotoxin activity, polymyxin B hemoperfusion treatment plus conventional medical therapy compared with sham treatment plus conventional medical therapy did not reduce mortality at 28 days.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01046669.
重要性:多粘菌素 B 血液灌流可降低脓毒症患者的血液内毒素水平。可使用快速检测法测量血液中的内毒素活性。使用多粘菌素 B 血液灌流治疗脓毒性休克和内毒素活性升高的患者,可能会改善临床结局。
目的:检测在脓毒性休克和高内毒素活性患者中,与单独常规治疗相比,添加多粘菌素 B 血液灌流治疗是否可提高生存率。
设计、地点和参与者:多中心、随机临床试验,纳入了 2010 年 9 月至 2016 年 6 月期间北美 55 家三级医院的 450 名患有脓毒性休克且内毒素活性检测值为 0.60 或更高的成年危重症患者。最后一次随访是在 2017 年 6 月。
干预措施:在入组后 24 小时内完成 2 次多粘菌素 B 血液灌流治疗(90-120 分钟)加标准治疗(n = 224 例患者)或假血液灌流加标准治疗(n = 226 例患者)。
主要结果和测量指标:主要结局为所有随机患者(所有参与者)和多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)超过 9 分的患者的 28 天死亡率。
结果:在 450 名符合条件的入组患者中(平均年龄 59.8 岁;177 [39.3%] 为女性;平均急性生理与慢性健康评分 II 为 29.4[范围 0-71,评分越高表示病情越严重]),449 名(99.8%)完成了研究。与假血液灌流治疗相比,多粘菌素 B 血液灌流治疗在所有参与者(治疗组 223 例中的 84 例[37.7%] vs 假血液灌流组 226 例中的 78 例[34.5%];风险差异[RD],3.2%;95%CI,-5.7%至 12.0%;相对风险[RR],1.09;95%CI,0.85-1.39;P = .49])或 MODS 超过 9 分的患者(治疗组 146 例中的 65 例[44.5%] vs 假血液灌流组 148 例中的 65 例[43.9%];RD,0.6%;95%CI,-10.8%至 11.9%;RR,1.01;95%CI,0.78-1.31;P = .92)中,28 天死亡率均无显著差异。总体而言,报告了 264 例严重不良事件(治疗组 65.1% vs 假血液灌流组 57.3%)。最常见的严重不良事件是败血症恶化(治疗组 10.8% vs 假血液灌流组 9.1%)和脓毒性休克恶化(治疗组 6.6% vs 假血液灌流组 7.7%)。
结论和相关性:在内毒素活性升高的脓毒性休克患者中,与假血液灌流治疗加常规治疗相比,多粘菌素 B 血液灌流治疗加常规治疗并未降低 28 天死亡率。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01046669。