• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化用户对卫生设施建设和使用的偏好:离散选择实验在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉的应用。

Quantifying user preferences for sanitation construction and use: Application of discrete choice experiments in Amhara, Ethiopia.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene& Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1364-1373. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13163. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1111/tmi.13163
PMID:30307673
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify stated preferences for latrine use and construction in Amhara, Ethiopia, using Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs).

METHODS

We conducted image-based DCEs to assess preferences for latrine use (stratified by gender) and construction (among men only) in Amhara, Ethiopia. Preference was quantified using a conditional logistic model to estimate utilities and corresponding odds ratios associated with a set of latrine attributes.

RESULTS

For latrine use, tin roof, handwashing stations and clean latrines had the highest relative utility coefficients. Tin roof was preferred to no roof for use (Women: OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 3.18-4.25; Men: OR: 3.75, 95% CI: 3.21-4.39) and new latrine construction (5.92, 5.04-6.95). Concrete slabs, a critical aspect of improved sanitation, was not preferred to dirt floors for use (Women: 0.87, 0.75-1.00; Men: 1.03, 0.88-1.20), but was preferred for new construction (1.52, 1.30-1.78). We did not observe any trends in preference for direct (monetary) or indirect cost (labour days), so we were not able to elicit trade-offs between latrine attributes and these costs for the construction of new latrines.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest similar latrine use preferences between men and women. We found that tin roofs are the most strongly preferred latrine characteristic, but concrete slabs, commonly promoted in sanitation programmes, were not preferred for use. We demonstrate the utility of DCEs to elicit stated preferences for latrine use and construction among community members who have myriad motivations for using and making improvements to their sanitation facilities, including the ease of cleaning and hygiene, durability, or privacy and comfort.

摘要

目的

使用离散选择实验(DCE)量化埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区人们对厕所使用和建设的偏好。

方法

我们在阿姆哈拉地区开展了基于图像的 DCE,以评估人们对厕所使用(按性别分层)和建设(仅限男性)的偏好。使用条件逻辑模型来量化偏好,以估计与一系列厕所属性相关的效用和相应的优势比。

结果

对于厕所使用,铁皮屋顶、洗手台和干净的厕所具有最高的相对效用系数。铁皮屋顶比没有屋顶更受欢迎,无论是用于使用(女性:OR:3.68,95%CI:3.18-4.25;男性:OR:3.75,95%CI:3.21-4.39)还是新厕所建设(5.92,5.04-6.95)。混凝土板是改善卫生的一个关键方面,但它不如泥土地板受欢迎,用于使用(女性:0.87,0.75-1.00;男性:1.03,0.88-1.20),但用于新建设(1.52,1.30-1.78)则更受欢迎。我们没有观察到对直接(货币)或间接成本(劳动日)的偏好趋势,因此我们无法在新厕所建设中权衡厕所属性与这些成本之间的关系。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,男性和女性对厕所使用具有相似的偏好。我们发现,铁皮屋顶是最受欢迎的厕所特征,但在卫生方案中广泛推广的混凝土板并不受欢迎用于使用。我们展示了 DCE 用于在具有众多使用和改善卫生设施动机的社区成员中得出对厕所使用和建设的偏好的效用,这些动机包括清洁和卫生的便利性、耐用性、隐私和舒适度等。

相似文献

1
Quantifying user preferences for sanitation construction and use: Application of discrete choice experiments in Amhara, Ethiopia.量化用户对卫生设施建设和使用的偏好:离散选择实验在埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉的应用。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1364-1373. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13163. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Effect of a community intervention with pit latrines in five districts of Amhara, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区五个区的社区干预式坑厕的效果。
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 May;15(5):592-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02500.x. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
3
Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study.评估社区主导的全面环境卫生方法对改善埃塞俄比亚北部拉利贝拉马乔克地区厕所利用的影响:一项比较性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203458. eCollection 2018.
4
Is Using a Latrine "A Strange Thing To Do"? A Mixed-Methods Study of Sanitation Preference and Behaviors in Rural Ethiopia.使用厕所是“一件奇怪的事”吗?埃塞俄比亚农村地区卫生设施偏好与行为的混合方法研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 11;96(1):65-73. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0541. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Exploring barriers to the adoption and utilization of improved latrine facilities in rural Ethiopia: An Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (IBM-WASH) approach.探索埃塞俄比亚农村地区采用和利用改良厕所设施的障碍:水、环境卫生和个人卫生综合行为模型(IBM-WASH)方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0245289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245289. eCollection 2021.
6
Effect of community led total sanitation and hygiene (CLTSH) implementation program on latrine utilization among adult villagers of North Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.社区主导的全面环境卫生与个人卫生(CLTSH)实施项目对埃塞俄比亚北部成年村民厕所使用情况的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 2;12(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4519-2.
7
A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚农村地区卫生设施采用、可持续性及持续使用障碍的社会生态分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):706. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4717-6.
8
Performance of Pit Latrines and Their Herd Protection Against Diarrhea: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Rural Ethiopia.坑式厕所的性能及其对腹泻的畜群保护作用:埃塞俄比亚农村的一项纵向队列研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00541.
9
Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia.为何不使用厕所:赞比亚东部猪带绦虫流行农村地区社区对厕所的认知与做法
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Mar 4;9(3):e0003570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003570. eCollection 2015 Mar.
10
Latrine Availability and Associated Factors among Religious Institutions in Northern Ethiopia, 2018.2018 年,埃塞俄比亚北部宗教机构的厕所可用性及其相关因素。
J Environ Public Health. 2020 Oct 28;2020:6498412. doi: 10.1155/2020/6498412. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Promotion of market-based sanitation in Ethiopia: a case study from Wolaita zone.埃塞俄比亚基于市场的卫生推广:沃莱塔地区的案例研究。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Apr 1;39(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae034.
2
Household-level sanitation in Ethiopia and its influencing factors: a systematic review.埃塞俄比亚家庭环境卫生及其影响因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):1448. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13822-5.
3
iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV.iSAY(南非青年激励计划):HIV 感染者年轻人的意愿调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113333. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113333. Epub 2020 Aug 29.