• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

努力还是结果?儿童的功绩决策。

Effort or outcome? Children's meritorious decisions.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;178:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005
PMID:30308337
Abstract

How individuals determine what is fair and just when allocating resources is a fundamental aspect of moral development. Decisions about fairness involve considerations such as merit, which includes effort (one's own exertion to achieve a goal) and outcome (one's product). Previous research has described merit in terms of both effort and outcome (e.g., a meritorious individual is both hard-working and productive). Crucially, no research has documented whether children give priority to being hard-working (high effort) or to being productive (high outcome or product) when allocating resources. This gap in the literature obfuscates two constructs that reflect how individuals allocate resources. The current study examined this process by which children (3- to 10-year-olds, N = 100; M = 7.27 years, SD = 2.39) weighed these two different aspects of merit in their fairness decisions in several situations where levels of effort and outcome were varied. When there was a discrepancy between effort and outcome, children increasingly prioritized effort over outcome with age and allocated more resources to hard-working peers than to productive peers. Effort and outcome were also examined. In situations where only effort varied (i.e., outcome was controlled), with age children were more likely to incorporate effort into their fairness decisions; however, in situations where only outcome varied (i.e., effort was controlled), with age children were less likely to incorporate effort into their fairness decisions. Taken together, the findings suggest that as children get older, they increasingly focus on effort of individuals rather than on their productivity when distributing resources.

摘要

当分配资源时,个人如何确定公平和公正的标准是道德发展的一个基本方面。公平决策涉及到诸如功绩等因素的考虑,其中包括努力(个人为实现目标所付出的努力)和结果(个人的成果)。先前的研究已经从努力和结果两个方面描述了功绩(例如,有功绩的人既努力工作又富有成效)。至关重要的是,没有研究记录儿童在分配资源时是优先考虑努力工作(高努力)还是富有成效(高结果或产品)。文献中的这一空白混淆了反映个人分配资源的两种结构。本研究通过让儿童(3 至 10 岁,N=100;M=7.27 岁,SD=2.39)在几个努力和结果水平不同的情境中,对其公平决策中对功绩的这两个不同方面进行权衡,考察了这一过程。当努力和结果存在差异时,随着年龄的增长,儿童越来越优先考虑努力而不是结果,他们会将更多的资源分配给努力工作的同龄人,而不是富有成效的同龄人。同时还考察了努力和结果。在仅努力不同(即结果得到控制)的情况下,随着年龄的增长,儿童更有可能将努力纳入其公平决策中;然而,在仅结果不同(即努力得到控制)的情况下,随着年龄的增长,儿童不太可能将努力纳入其公平决策中。总的来说,这些发现表明,随着儿童年龄的增长,他们在分配资源时越来越关注个人的努力,而不是他们的生产力。

相似文献

1
Effort or outcome? Children's meritorious decisions.努力还是结果?儿童的功绩决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;178:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
Children's recognition of fairness and others' welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes.儿童在资源分配任务中对公平和他人福利的认知:与年龄相关的变化。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Aug;52(8):1307-17. doi: 10.1037/dev0000134.
3
Group bias in children's merit-based resource allocation.儿童基于优点的资源分配中的群体偏见。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality.反对不公平:幼儿对优点、公平和平等的判断。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;186:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
That's not fair: Children's neural computations of fairness and their impact on resource allocation behaviors and judgments.这不公平:儿童对公平的神经计算及其对资源分配行为和判断的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2299-2310. doi: 10.1037/dev0000813. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Preschoolers' social experiences and empathy-based responding relate to their fair resource allocation.学龄前儿童的社会经历和基于同理心的反应与他们公平的资源分配有关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Sep;161:202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Normative expectations about fairness: The development of a charity norm in preschoolers.关于公平的规范性期望:学前儿童慈善规范的发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:66-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 May 3.
8
The development of distributive justice orientations: contextual influences on children's resource allocations.分配正义取向的发展:情境对儿童资源分配的影响
Child Dev. 1991 Dec;62(6):1367-78.
9
Children's reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development.儿童在成长过程中对分配正义和报应正义的推理。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Apr;52(4):613-28. doi: 10.1037/a0040069. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
"But the poor needed it more": Children's judgments on procedural justice to allocate resources between two candidates equal in merit, different in need.“但穷人更需要它”:儿童对程序正义的判断,即在两名功绩相当但需求不同的候选人之间分配资源。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Aug;232:105679. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105679. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's group identity is related to their assessment of fair and unfair advantages.儿童群体认同与他们对公平和不公平优势的评估有关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Feb;214:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105292. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
2
The Origins of Intergroup Resource Inequality Influence Children's Decision to Perpetuate or Rectify Inequality.群体间资源不平等的起源影响儿童延续或纠正不平等的决定。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 27;11:571570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571570. eCollection 2020.