Suppr超能文献

重复经颅磁刺激干预描述的完整性:对rTMS治疗抑郁症随机对照试验的系统评价

Completeness of Descriptions of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intervention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of rTMS in Depression.

作者信息

Chantebel Romain, Chesneau Adélise, Tavernier Elsa, El-Hage Wissam, Caille Agnès

机构信息

From the Clinique Psychiatrique Universitaire.

出版信息

J ECT. 2019 Mar;35(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000546.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an innovative therapeutic option in major depressive disorder (MDD). A complete description of the procedure in reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a prerequisite for implementation of rTMS in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the completeness of descriptions of the intervention in RCTs assessing rTMS in MDD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of RCTs evaluating rTMS in MDD and published until August 2016. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, and PsycINFO to identify eligible trials. The completeness of the intervention description was evaluated by the use of an adapted-to-rTMS version of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. We defined core items that are the most essential to be reported. Missing information was then sought from additional sources and by e-mailing authors.

RESULTS

We identified 98 trials reporting 134 interventions. None of the interventions were completely described in the full text of the articles, even after searching additional sources. After contacting the authors, 14 (10.4%) of 134 interventions were completely described. The core items were completely described in 74 (55.2%) of 134 interventions after contacting the authors.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that rTMS interventions delivered in RCTs are incompletely reported, which prevents their adequate implementation in clinical practice and accurate interpretation of their efficacy. We encourage authors, editors, and reviewers to use the existing reporting guidelines and specifically the TIDieR checklist when describing the intervention. We provide an adapted-to-rTMS TIDieR checklist that could help in the reporting of future trials.

摘要

目的

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是重度抑郁症(MDD)的一种创新治疗选择。在随机对照试验(RCT)报告中对该治疗程序进行完整描述是rTMS在临床实践中得以应用的前提条件。本研究旨在评估在评估rTMS治疗MDD的RCT中,干预措施描述的完整性。

方法

我们对截至2016年8月发表的评估rTMS治疗MDD的RCT进行了系统评价。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO以确定符合条件的试验。使用针对rTMS改编的干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)清单来评估干预描述的完整性。我们定义了最基本的核心项目。然后从其他来源并通过给作者发电子邮件来查找缺失信息。

结果

我们识别出98项报告了134种干预措施的试验。即使在检索其他来源之后,也没有一项干预措施在文章全文中得到完整描述。在联系作者之后,134种干预措施中有14种(10.4%)得到了完整描述。在联系作者之后,134种干预措施中有74种(55.2%)的核心项目得到了完整描述。

结论

我们发现RCT中实施的rTMS干预措施报告不完整,这妨碍了它们在临床实践中的充分应用以及对其疗效的准确解读。我们鼓励作者、编辑和审稿人在描述干预措施时使用现有的报告指南,特别是TIDieR清单。我们提供了一份针对rTMS改编的TIDieR清单,这可能有助于未来试验的报告。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验