Suppr超能文献

在骨关节炎性膝关节患者中使用超声前外侧入路对两种不同关节内注射进行比较。

The comparison of two different intraarticular injections using a sonographic anterolateral approach in patients with osteoarthritic knee.

作者信息

Choi Jin Wook, Lee Jun Ho, Ki Minjong, Kim Myung Jong, Kang Sehrin, Lee Juhyung, Lee Jun-Rae, Han Young-Jin, Son Ji-Seon

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2018 Oct;31(4):289-295. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee.

METHODS

A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7-97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6-99.5), respectively ( = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle.

摘要

背景

关节内(IA)注射已成为治疗无积液的骨关节炎膝关节的常用方法。如果能够通过视觉确认,IA注射的成功率会更高。我们假设,一种使用超声靶向外侧髁滑膜的前外侧入路,将为靶向内侧髁滑膜进行膝关节IA注射的前外侧入路提供等效的替代方法。

方法

总共96例骨关节炎膝关节被随机分为两组,即I组(内侧髁前外侧入路)和II组(外侧髁前外侧入路)。主要结果是比较两种IA注射方法的成功率。还测量并比较了注射所需的针长。使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度,以评估注射的成功率。

结果

两组之间的成功率无显著差异。I组和II组的成功率分别为87.8%(95%,CI 78.7 - 97.0)和91.5%(95%,CI 83.6 - 99.5)( = 0.549)。I组的针深度为5.0 ± 0.8(3.0至6.1厘米),II组为3.0 ± 0.8(1.5至5厘米)( < 0.001)。

结论

使用超声的外侧股骨髁前外侧入路是一种替代方法,可替代靶向内侧股骨髁的入路,且使用的针较短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5273/6177542/a83b1cd6da3e/kjpain-31-289-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验