Choi Jin Wook, Lee Jun Ho, Ki Minjong, Kim Myung Jong, Kang Sehrin, Lee Juhyung, Lee Jun-Rae, Han Young-Jin, Son Ji-Seon
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.
Korean J Pain. 2018 Oct;31(4):289-295. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.289. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
The intraarticular (IA) injection has become popular for the management of the osteoarthritic knee without an effusion. The success rate of IA injection would be better if it was able to be visually confirmed. We hypothesized that an anterolateral approach, which targets the synovial membrane of the lateral condyle using ultrasound, would provide an equivalent alternative to the anterolateral approach, targeting the synovial membrane of the medial condyle for IA injection of the knee.
A total of 96 knees with osteoarthritis were randomized placed into the two groups, which were group I (anterolateral approach to the medial condyle) and group II (anterolateral approach to the lateral condyle). The primary outcome was to compare the success rate of the two methods of IA injection. The required length of the needle for injection was also measured and compared. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale in order to evaluate the success of injection.
There were no significant differences in the success rate between both groups. The success rate of group I and group II were 87.8% (95%, CI 78.7-97.0) and 91.5% (95%, CI 83.6-99.5), respectively ( = 0.549). The needle depth was 5.0 ± 0.8 (3.0 to 6.1 cm) in group I, and 3.0 ± 0.8 (1.5 to 5 cm) in group II ( < 0.001).
The anterolateral approach to the lateral femoral condyle, using ultrasound, is an alternative method to the approach targeting the medial femoral condyle, using shorter needle.
关节内(IA)注射已成为治疗无积液的骨关节炎膝关节的常用方法。如果能够通过视觉确认,IA注射的成功率会更高。我们假设,一种使用超声靶向外侧髁滑膜的前外侧入路,将为靶向内侧髁滑膜进行膝关节IA注射的前外侧入路提供等效的替代方法。
总共96例骨关节炎膝关节被随机分为两组,即I组(内侧髁前外侧入路)和II组(外侧髁前外侧入路)。主要结果是比较两种IA注射方法的成功率。还测量并比较了注射所需的针长。使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度,以评估注射的成功率。
两组之间的成功率无显著差异。I组和II组的成功率分别为87.8%(95%,CI 78.7 - 97.0)和91.5%(95%,CI 83.6 - 99.5)( = 0.549)。I组的针深度为5.0 ± 0.8(3.0至6.1厘米),II组为3.0 ± 0.8(1.5至5厘米)( < 0.001)。
使用超声的外侧股骨髁前外侧入路是一种替代方法,可替代靶向内侧股骨髁的入路,且使用的针较短。