David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, David Geffen School ofMedicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1727-1731. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
Improvements in technology and operator experience have led to exponential growth of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) programs. Late bleeding complications were recently highlighted after TAVI with a high impact on morbidity. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence and financial impact of late Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding after TAVI, and compare with the surgical cohort. Retrospective analysis of the National Readmissions Database was performed from January 2011 to December 2014, and patients who underwent TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were identified. Incidence of readmission with a diagnosis of GI bleeding was utilized as the primary end point. Overall, 43,357 patients were identified who underwent TAVI, whereas 310,013 patients underwent SAVR. Compared with SAVR, TAVI patients were older (81 vs 68y, p < 0.001), more women (48% vs 36%, p < 0.001), and had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (6 vs 5, p < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter with TAVI (5 vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but raw in-hospital mortality rates were similar (4.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.022). In the TAVI cohort, 3.3% of patients were rehospitalized for GI bleeding compared with 1.5% of the SAVR cohort (p < 0.001). Average time to bleeding readmission was similar between cohorts (92 vs 84 days, p = 0.049). After multivariable adjustment, TAVI remained significantly associated with readmissions for GI bleeding compared with SAVR Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR 1.54 [1.38 to 1.71], p < 0.001). In this national cohort study, TAVI was associated with more frequent readmissions for late GI bleeding compared with SAVR. In conclusion, strategies to reduce late GI bleeding may serve as important targets for improvement in overall quality of care.
技术和操作人员经验的提高导致经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)项目呈指数级增长。最近,TAVI 后出现迟发性出血并发症,对发病率有很大影响。本研究的目的是评估 TAVI 后迟发性胃肠道(GI)出血的发生率和财务影响,并与手术队列进行比较。对 2011 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间的国家再入院数据库进行回顾性分析,并确定接受 TAVI 或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者。将以 GI 出血诊断再入院的发生率作为主要终点。共有 43357 例患者接受了 TAVI,而 310013 例患者接受了 SAVR。与 SAVR 相比,TAVI 患者年龄更大(81 岁 vs 68 岁,p<0.001),女性比例更高(48% vs 36%,p<0.001),Elixhauser 合并症指数更高(6 分 vs 5 分,p<0.001)。TAVI 组的住院时间更短(5 天 vs 8 天,p<0.001),但住院死亡率相似(4.2% vs 3.8%,p=0.022)。在 TAVI 组中,3.3%的患者因 GI 出血再次住院,而 SAVR 组为 1.5%(p<0.001)。两组出血再入院的平均时间相似(92 天 vs 84 天,p=0.049)。多变量调整后,与 SAVR 相比,TAVI 与 GI 出血的再入院显著相关,调整后的优势比(AOR 1.54 [1.38 至 1.71],p<0.001)。在这项全国性队列研究中,与 SAVR 相比,TAVI 与迟发性 GI 出血再入院的相关性更高。总之,减少迟发性 GI 出血的策略可能是提高整体护理质量的重要目标。