Connors Michael H, Quinto Lena, Brodaty Henry
Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):727-737. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002829. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
Depression and a number of other psychiatric conditions can impair cognition and give the appearance of neurodegenerative disease. Collectively, this group of disorders is known as 'pseudodementia' and are important to identify given their potential reversibility with treatment. Despite considerable interest historically, the longitudinal outcomes of patients with pseudodementia remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review of longitudinal studies of pseudodementia. Bibliographic databases were searched using a wide range of search terms. Two reviewers independently assessed papers for inclusion, rated study quality, and extracted data. The search identified 18 studies with follow-up varying from several weeks to 18 years. Overall, 284 patients were studied, including 238 patients with depression, 18 with conversion disorder, 14 with psychosis, and 11 with bipolar disorder. Irrespective of diagnosis, 33% developed irreversible dementia at follow-up, 53% no longer met criteria for dementia, and 15% were lost to follow-up. Considerable variability was identified, with younger age at baseline, but not follow-up duration, associated with better outcomes. ECT and pharmacological interventions were also reported to be beneficial, though findings were limited by the poor quality of the studies. Overall, the findings suggest that pseudodementia may confer an increased risk of irreversible dementia in older patients. The findings also indicate, however, that a significant proportion improve, while many remain burdened with their psychiatric condition, independent of organic dementia. The findings support the clinical value of the construct and the need for its re-examination in light of developments in neuroimaging, genomics, other investigative tools, and trial methodology.
抑郁症和其他一些精神疾病会损害认知功能,并呈现出神经退行性疾病的表象。这一组疾病统称为“假性痴呆”,鉴于其通过治疗可能具有可逆性,因此识别它们很重要。尽管历史上人们对此颇感兴趣,但假性痴呆患者的纵向转归仍不明确。我们对假性痴呆的纵向研究进行了系统评价。使用广泛的检索词搜索文献数据库。两名评价者独立评估纳入的论文,评定研究质量并提取数据。检索确定了18项研究,随访时间从数周至18年不等。总体而言,共研究了284例患者,其中包括238例抑郁症患者、18例转换障碍患者、14例精神病患者和11例双相情感障碍患者。无论诊断如何,33%的患者在随访时发展为不可逆性痴呆,53%不再符合痴呆标准,15%失访。研究发现存在相当大的变异性,基线时年龄较小与较好的转归相关,但随访时间长短无关。据报道,ECT和药物干预也有益,不过研究结果因研究质量差而受到限制。总体而言,研究结果表明假性痴呆可能会增加老年患者发生不可逆性痴呆的风险。然而,研究结果还表明,相当一部分患者病情有所改善,而许多患者仍受其精神疾病的困扰,与器质性痴呆无关。这些发现支持了该概念的临床价值,以及鉴于神经影像学、基因组学、其他研究工具和试验方法的发展而对其进行重新审视的必要性。