Sedighinejad Abbas, Naderi Nabi Bahram, Ettehad Hossein, Mirbolook Ahmadreza, Atrkarroushan Zahra, Ghazanfar Tehran Samaneh, Biazar Gelareh, Haghighi Mohammad
Research performed at Anesthesiology Research Center, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences (GUMS), Rasht, Iran.
Anesthesiology Research Center, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences (GUMS), Rasht, Iran.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Sep;6(5):390-396.
Hip fracture is one of the most common problems in elderly that needs surgical repair. As, the majority of these patients have chronic diseases, they are at increased risk of peri-operative mortality and morbidity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine vs bupivacaine in combination with lidocaine in terms of hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
This double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 292 patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia. Patients were allocated into two groups of B (10 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine) and BL (5 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% plus 50 mg Lidocaine 5%). Sensory and motor block and hemodynamic changes were consecutively measured before spinal anesthesia (T0), immediately after spinal injection (T1), every 5 minutes for half an hour (T2- T7), and at 45 minutes (T8) and 60 minutes (T9) after injection.
Patients in the two groups were homogeneous in demographic characteristics including age, sex, BMI, ASA Class, baseline blood pressure and heart rate. The onsets of sensory and motor blocks in group BL were faster than group B (). Also, the durations of sensory and motor blocks in group B were significantly longer than group BL ). The BL group had a significantly lower systolic blood pressure in all periods (). Although the heart rate in the BL group was lower than group B at all time points, this difference was only significant during T2-T3 ( and , respectively). Group BL had significantly more episodes of hypotension, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting (, , , and , respectively).
According to our findings, using Lidocaine 50 mg in combination with Bupivacaine 5 mg, compared with Bupivacaine 10 mg alone for spinal anesthesia in hip fracture fixation surgeries was associated with more hypotension and bradycardia. As a result, combination of Bupivacaine with Lidocaine at this dose is not recommended for induction of anesthesia in these patients.
髋部骨折是老年人最常见的问题之一,需要手术修复。由于这些患者大多数患有慢性疾病,他们围手术期死亡率和发病率的风险增加。本研究的目的是评估布比卡因脊髓麻醉与布比卡因联合利多卡因在髋部骨折手术患者血流动力学变化方面的差异。
本双盲临床试验对292例接受脊髓麻醉下髋部骨折手术的患者进行。患者被分为两组,B组(10mg高压0.5%布比卡因)和BL组(5mg高压0.5%布比卡因加50mg 5%利多卡因)。在脊髓麻醉前(T0)、脊髓注射后立即(T1)、半小时内每5分钟(T2 - T7)、注射后45分钟(T8)和60分钟(T9)连续测量感觉和运动阻滞以及血流动力学变化。
两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级、基线血压和心率等人口统计学特征方面具有同质性。BL组感觉和运动阻滞的起效比B组快()。此外,B组感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间明显长于BL组()。BL组在所有时间段收缩压均显著较低()。尽管BL组心率在所有时间点均低于B组,但这种差异仅在T2 - T3期间显著(分别为和)。BL组低血压、心动过缓、恶心和呕吐发作明显更多(分别为,,,和)。
根据我们的研究结果,在髋部骨折固定手术中,与单独使用10mg布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉相比,使用50mg利多卡因联合5mg布比卡因会导致更多的低血压和心动过缓。因此,不建议在这些患者中使用此剂量的布比卡因与利多卡因联合进行麻醉诱导。