Hou Yi, Cao Xuemei, Hu Xiangnan, Li Xinyu, Shi Xiaoqin, Wang Hongying, Peng Chuan, Li Jiayu, Li Jibin, Li Qifu, Wu Chaodong, Xiao Xiaoqiu
Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
The Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Major Metabolic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Genes Dis. 2018 Jun 6;5(3):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.004. eCollection 2018 Sep.
Traditional thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as rosiglitazone, are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) potent agonists that can be used to treat type 2 diabetes but carry unwanted effects, including increased risk for fracture. The present work aimed to compare the insulin-sensitizing efficacies and bone-loss side effects of CMHX008, a novel TZDs-like PPARγ partial agonist, with those of rosiglitazone. A TR-FRET PPARγ competitive binding assay was used to compare the binding affinity between CMHX008 and rosiglitazone. Mice were administered vehicle, CMHX008 or rosiglitazone for 16 weeks. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used to examine differences in differentiation into osteoblasts after compounds treatment. TR-FRET showed lower affinity to PPARγ by CMHX008 compared with rosiglitazone. Mice treated with CMHX008 showed insulin sensitization similar to that of mice treated with rosiglitazone, which was related to the significant inhibition of PPARγ Ser273 phosphorylation and improved insulin sensitivity by facilitating the phosphorylation of insulin receptor and Akt in adipose tissues. Micro-CT and histomorphometric analyses demonstrated that the degree of trabecular bone loss after treatment with CMHX008 was weaker than that observed with rosiglitazone, as evidenced by consistent changes in BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and the mineral apposition rate. MSCs treated with CMHX008 showed higher ALP activity and mRNA levels of bone formation markers than did cells treated with rosiglitazone in the osteoblast differentiation test. Thus, CMHX008 showed insulin-sensitizing effects similar to those of rosiglitazone with a lower risk of bone loss, suggesting that PPARγ sparing eliminates the skeletal side effects of TZDs while maintaining their insulin-sensitizing properties.
传统的噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs),如罗格列酮,是过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)的强效激动剂,可用于治疗2型糖尿病,但会带来不良影响,包括骨折风险增加。本研究旨在比较新型TZDs样PPARγ部分激动剂CMHX008与罗格列酮的胰岛素增敏效果和骨质流失副作用。采用时间分辨荧光能量共振转移(TR-FRET)PPARγ竞争性结合试验比较CMHX008与罗格列酮之间的结合亲和力。给小鼠施用赋形剂、CMHX008或罗格列酮16周。使用间充质干细胞(MSCs)检测化合物处理后向成骨细胞分化的差异。TR-FRET结果显示,与罗格列酮相比,CMHX008对PPARγ的亲和力较低。用CMHX008治疗的小鼠表现出与用罗格列酮治疗的小鼠相似的胰岛素增敏作用,这与PPARγ Ser273磷酸化的显著抑制以及通过促进脂肪组织中胰岛素受体和Akt的磷酸化改善胰岛素敏感性有关。显微CT和组织形态计量学分析表明,CMHX008治疗后小梁骨丢失程度比罗格列酮治疗后观察到的要轻,骨体积分数(BV/TV)、骨小梁数量(Tb.N)、骨小梁厚度(Tb.Th)、骨小梁间距(Tb.Sp)和矿物质沉积率的一致变化证明了这一点。在成骨细胞分化试验中,用CMHX008处理的MSCs比用罗格列酮处理的细胞表现出更高的碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性和骨形成标志物的mRNA水平。因此,CMHX008显示出与罗格列酮相似的胰岛素增敏作用,同时骨质流失风险较低,这表明保留PPARγ可消除TZDs的骨骼副作用,同时保持其胰岛素增敏特性。