College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, 250014, China; State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Environ Pollut. 2019 Jan;244:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.147. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Absolute principal component score/multiple linear regression (APCS/MLR) and positive matrix factorization (PMF) were applied to a dataset consisting of 10 heavy metals in 300 surface soils samples. Robust geostatistics were used to delineate and compare the factors derived from these two receptor models. Both APCS/MLR and PMF afforded three similar source factors with comparable contributions, but APCS/MLR had some negative and unidentified contributions; thus, PMF, with its optimal non-negativity results, was adopted for source apportionment. Experimental variograms for each factor from two receptor models were built using classical Matheron's and three robust estimators. The best association of experimental variograms fitted to theoretical models differed between the corresponding APCS and PMF-factors. However, kriged interpolation indicated that the corresponding APCS and PMF-factor showed similar spatial variability. Based on PMF and robust geostatistics, three sources of 10 heavy metals in Guangrao were determined. As, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn, and partially Hg, Pb, Cd originated from natural source. The factor grouping these heavy metals showed consistent distribution with parent material map. 43.1% of Hg and 13.2% of Pb were related to atmosphere deposition of human inputs, with high values of their association patterns being located around urban areas. 29.6% concentration of Cd was associated with agricultural practice, and the hotspot coincided with the spatial distribution of vegetable-producing soils. Overall, natural source, atmosphere deposition of human emissions, and agricultural practices, explained 81.1%, 7.3%, and 11.6% of the total of 10 heavy metals concentrations, respectively. Receptor models coupled with robust geostatistics could successfully estimate the source apportionment of heavy metals in soils.
绝对主成分得分/多元线性回归 (APCS/MLR) 和正矩阵因子分解 (PMF) 被应用于由 300 个表层土壤样本中的 10 种重金属组成的数据集。稳健的地质统计学被用来描绘和比较这两种受体模型得出的因子。APCS/MLR 和 PMF 都提供了三个相似的源因子,贡献相当,但 APCS/MLR 有一些负的和未识别的贡献;因此,PMF 因其最佳的非负性结果而被用于源解析。使用经典的 Matheron 方法和三种稳健估计器为两种受体模型的每个因子构建实验变差函数。从两个受体模型拟合理论模型的实验变差函数的最佳关联在相应的 APCS 和 PMF 因子之间有所不同。然而,克立格插值表明,相应的 APCS 和 PMF 因子表现出相似的空间变异性。基于 PMF 和稳健地质统计学,确定了广饶地区 10 种重金属的三个来源。As、Co、Cr、Cu、Mn、Ni、Zn 和部分 Hg、Pb、Cd 源自自然源。这些重金属的因子分组与母质图具有一致的分布。43.1%的 Hg 和 13.2%的 Pb 与人类输入的大气沉降有关,其关联模式的高值位于城市周围。29.6%的 Cd 浓度与农业实践有关,热点与蔬菜生产土壤的空间分布一致。总的来说,自然源、人类排放的大气沉降和农业实践分别解释了 10 种重金属总浓度的 81.1%、7.3%和 11.6%。受体模型与稳健地质统计学相结合,可以成功地估算土壤中重金属的源解析。