Lewis Ariane
Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Semin Neurol. 2018 Oct;38(5):576-582. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668075. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
Although the concept of death by neurologic criteria is accepted throughout much of the world and death can legally be determined by neurologic criteria throughout the United States, the process is fraught with contentious ethical and legal controversies. I explore historic and contemporary ethical and legal disputes about determination of death by neurologic criteria including the need for consent from patients' surrogates prior to determination of death, the role of religion in determination of death, management of objections to determination of death by neurologic criteria, the approach to patients who are dead by neurologic criteria but are pregnant, and gamete retrieval after determination of death.
尽管神经学标准判定死亡的概念在世界大部分地区都被接受,并且在美国全境死亡可以依据神经学标准合法判定,但这一过程充满了有争议的伦理和法律争端。我探讨了关于神经学标准判定死亡的历史和当代伦理及法律争议,包括在判定死亡前获得患者代理人同意的必要性、宗教在判定死亡中的作用、对神经学标准判定死亡的反对意见的处理、神经学标准判定已死亡但仍怀孕患者的处理方法以及判定死亡后的配子提取。