Suppr超能文献

脑死亡判定中存在争议的伦理和法律问题。

Contentious Ethical and Legal Aspects of Determination of Brain Death.

作者信息

Lewis Ariane

机构信息

Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Semin Neurol. 2018 Oct;38(5):576-582. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668075. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Abstract

Although the concept of death by neurologic criteria is accepted throughout much of the world and death can legally be determined by neurologic criteria throughout the United States, the process is fraught with contentious ethical and legal controversies. I explore historic and contemporary ethical and legal disputes about determination of death by neurologic criteria including the need for consent from patients' surrogates prior to determination of death, the role of religion in determination of death, management of objections to determination of death by neurologic criteria, the approach to patients who are dead by neurologic criteria but are pregnant, and gamete retrieval after determination of death.

摘要

尽管神经学标准判定死亡的概念在世界大部分地区都被接受,并且在美国全境死亡可以依据神经学标准合法判定,但这一过程充满了有争议的伦理和法律争端。我探讨了关于神经学标准判定死亡的历史和当代伦理及法律争议,包括在判定死亡前获得患者代理人同意的必要性、宗教在判定死亡中的作用、对神经学标准判定死亡的反对意见的处理、神经学标准判定已死亡但仍怀孕患者的处理方法以及判定死亡后的配子提取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验