Suppr超能文献

简化 N-氨 PET 心肌血流定量:与标准室模型的比较研究,以方便临床应用。

Simplified quantification of N-ammonia PET myocardial blood flow: A comparative study with the standard compartment model to facilitate clinical use.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Jun;27(3):819-828. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1450-1. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short imaging protocol to quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) may enhance the clinical application of N-ammonia cardiac PET. We assessed the flow quantitation of N-ammonia PET implementing simple retention model and two-compartment model.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers (HVT) and twenty-three clinical patients received N-ammonia PET/CT. The simple retention model used the first 7-minute image to quantify MBF. Global and regional MBF and MFR of the two models were compared.

RESULTS

Global and regional MBF and MFR of these two models were highly correlated with mildly inferior correlation in RCA territory (global R: rest MBF = 0.79, stress MBF = 0.65, MFR = 0.77; regional R: rest MBF ≥ 0.72, stress MBF ≥ 0.52, MFR ≥ 0.68). There were significant differences for MFR (4.04 ± 0.72, 3.66 ± 0.48, p = .02) and rest MBF (0.69 ± 0.12, 0.78 ± 0.12, p = .02) between the two models in the HVT group.

CONCLUSIONS

N-ammonia global and regional MBF and MFR from the simple retention model demonstrate strong correlations with that from the two-compartment model. Significant differences of MFR and rest MBF are noted in the HVT group, with a proposed normal reference value for the N-ammonia short simple retention protocol.

摘要

背景

缩短心肌血流(MBF)和心肌血流储备(MFR)的成像方案,可能会增强 N-氨心脏正电子发射断层扫描的临床应用。我们评估了使用简单保留模型和双室模型进行 N-氨 PET 的血流定量。

方法

14 名健康志愿者(HVT)和 23 名临床患者接受了 N-氨 PET/CT。简单保留模型使用前 7 分钟的图像来量化 MBF。比较了两种模型的全局和局部 MBF 和 MFR。

结果

两种模型的全局和局部 MBF 和 MFR 高度相关,右冠状动脉(RCA)区域的相关性略低(全局 R:静息 MBF=0.79,应激 MBF=0.65,MFR=0.77;区域 R:静息 MBF≥0.72,应激 MBF≥0.52,MFR≥0.68)。HVT 组中,两种模型之间的 MFR(4.04±0.72、3.66±0.48,p=0.02)和静息 MBF(0.69±0.12、0.78±0.12,p=0.02)存在显著差异。

结论

简单保留模型的 N-氨全局和局部 MBF 和 MFR 与双室模型具有很强的相关性。HVT 组中注意到 MFR 和静息 MBF 的差异较大,提出了 N-氨短简单保留方案的正常参考值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验