Decrease in uterine perforations with ultrasound image-guided applicator insertion in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

To estimate uterine perforations rates during intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer with and without ultrasound (US) image guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of databases (PubMed and EMBASE) was performed. The pooled summary uterine perforation rate (detected by postinsertion CT or MRI) for the un-guided insertion group and the guided insertion group was calculated by using the random-effects model weighted by the inverse variance.

RESULTS

A total of 690 articles were initially found, resulting in 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1757 insertions and 766 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The overall uterine perforation rate per insertion was 4.56% (95%CI: 2.35-8.67) and per patient was 7.39% (95%CI: 3.92-13.50). The pooled perforation rate per insertion without image guidance was 10.54% (95%CI: 6.12-17.57) versus 1.06% (95%CI: 0.41-2.67) with image guidance (p < 0.01). The pooled perforation rate per patient without guidance was 16.67% (95%CI: 10.01-26.45) versus 2.54% (95%CI: 1.21-5.24) with image guidance (p < 0.01). The ratio of perforations in the un-guided/guided groups was 9.94 and 6.56, per insertion and per patient, respectively. The most common sites of perforation were the posterior wall (>47 events) and the uterine fundus (24 events). None of the studies reported significant acute clinical consequences. Prophylactic antibiotic after perforation was used in 3 of the 4 studies that described the management.

CONCLUSION

Using postinsertion CT or MRI to detect the perforation, the rate of uterine perforation per insertion in patients who received US-guided intracavitary brachytherapy insertion is 90% lower than with un-guided insertion.