Department of Cardiology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine.
Department of Cardiology, Asahi University Hospital.
Circ J. 2018 Nov 24;82(12):3029-3036. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0799. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Although new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with ageing, the prediction of new-onset AF is complicated. We previously reported that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (ePCWP) estimated by the combination of left atrial volume index (LAVI) and active left atrial emptying function (aLAEF) had a strong relationship with PCWP on catheterization (r=0.92): ePCWP=10.8-12.4×log (aLAEF/minimum LAVI). We sought to determine the usefulness of ePCWP to predict new-onset AF.
We measured LAVI, aLAEF and ePCWP on speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in 566 consecutive elderly patients (72±6 years) without a history of AF. A total of 63 patients (73±6 years) developed electrocardiographically confirmed AF during a mean follow-up period of 50 months. Baseline aLAEF was significantly lower in patients with than without new-onset AF (17.9±6.5 vs. 28.2±7.5%), whereas ePCWP was significantly higher (14.8±3.7 vs. 10.3±3.1 mmHg). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ePCWP and aLAEF were strong independent predictors of AF. Using ePCWP >13 mmHg or aLAEF ≤22% on univariate Cox regression analysis, the HR for new-onset AF were 3.53 (95% CI: 1.68-7.44, P<0.001) and 4.06 (95% CI: 1.90-8.65, P<0.001), respectively. By combining these 2 criteria (>13 mmHg and ≤22%), the HR increased to 11.84 (95% CI: 6.85-20.5, P<0.001).
ePCWP and aLAEF measured on STE are useful predictors of new-onset AF. ePCWP provides added value for risk stratification of new-onset AF.
尽管新发心房颤动(AF)随年龄增长而增加,但新发 AF 的预测较为复杂。我们之前的报告表明,左心房容积指数(LAVI)和主动左心房排空功能(aLAEF)联合估算的肺毛细血管楔压(ePCWP)与导管检查的 PCWP 具有很强的相关性(r=0.92):ePCWP=10.8-12.4×log(aLAEF/minimum LAVI)。我们旨在确定 ePCWP 预测新发 AF 的有用性。
我们对 566 例连续的老年患者(72±6 岁)进行斑点追踪超声心动图(STE)测量 LAVI、aLAEF 和 ePCWP,这些患者均无 AF 病史。在平均 50 个月的随访期间,共有 63 例患者(73±6 岁)出现心电图确诊的 AF。新发 AF 患者的基线 aLAEF 显著低于无新发 AF 患者(17.9±6.5 vs. 28.2±7.5%),而 ePCWP 显著更高(14.8±3.7 vs. 10.3±3.1 mmHg)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,ePCWP 和 aLAEF 是 AF 的独立强预测因子。在单变量 Cox 回归分析中,ePCWP>13mmHg 或 aLAEF≤22%时,新发 AF 的 HR 分别为 3.53(95%CI:1.68-7.44,P<0.001)和 4.06(95%CI:1.90-8.65,P<0.001)。通过联合这 2 个标准(>13mmHg 和≤22%),HR 增加至 11.84(95%CI:6.85-20.5,P<0.001)。
STE 测量的 ePCWP 和 aLAEF 是新发 AF 的有用预测因子。ePCWP 为新发 AF 的风险分层提供了附加价值。