Žugčić Tihana, Abdelkebir Radhia, Barba Francisco J, Rezek-Jambrak Anet, Gálvez Fernando, Zamuz Sol, Granato Daniel, Lorenzo José M
1Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
2Nutrition and Food Science Area, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Food Science, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitat de València, Avda. Vicent Andrés Estellés, s/n, 46100 Burjassot, València Spain.
J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Nov;55(11):4544-4553. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3390-9. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Physicochemical parameters (pH, colour and texture), proximate composition (moisture, protein, lipid and ash content), amino acid content, and taste profile of beef patties elaborated with soy (control), pulses (pea, lentil and bean) and microalgal ( and ) proteins were assessed. The pH, colour, ash content, total, essential and non-essential amino acids and amino acid content were significantly different among the beef patties studied. In this regard, beef patties prepared with pea protein presented the highest values for pH; whereas beef patties manufactured with pea also showed the highest values for lightness and patties elaborated with bean the highest values for redness. Similar textural parameters were observed among the six batches of beef patties manufactured. Regarding ash content, a significant higher content was observed in the beef patties prepared with soy compared to the other ones. On the other hand, the beef patties elaborated with bean and seaweeds showed the highest values for the total amino acids content. The inclusion of bean and seaweed proteins increased the concentrations of all amino acids in beef patties, being glutamic acids, lysine and aspartic acid the predominant amino acids. Regarding the taste analysis, a similar profile was found among the six batches of beef patties studied. Considering all studied parameters, beef patties elaborated with bean protein could be used as an alternative protein source respect to soy protein because of it showed a similar nutritional content and taste profile and higher amino acid content.
对用大豆(对照)、豆类(豌豆、小扁豆和菜豆)和微藻( 和 )蛋白制作的牛肉饼的物理化学参数(pH值、颜色和质地)、近似成分(水分、蛋白质、脂质和灰分含量)、氨基酸含量和风味特征进行了评估。在所研究的牛肉饼中,pH值、颜色、灰分含量、总氨基酸、必需氨基酸和非必需氨基酸以及氨基酸含量存在显著差异。在这方面,用豌豆蛋白制作的牛肉饼pH值最高;而用豌豆制作的牛肉饼亮度值也最高,用菜豆制作的牛肉饼红色值最高。在所制作的六批牛肉饼中观察到了相似的质地参数。关于灰分含量,与其他牛肉饼相比,用大豆制作的牛肉饼灰分含量显著更高。另一方面,用菜豆和海藻制作的牛肉饼总氨基酸含量最高。添加菜豆和海藻蛋白增加了牛肉饼中所有氨基酸的浓度,其中谷氨酸、赖氨酸和天冬氨酸是主要氨基酸。关于风味分析,在所研究的六批牛肉饼中发现了相似的风味特征。考虑到所有研究参数,用菜豆蛋白制作的牛肉饼可以作为大豆蛋白的替代蛋白质来源,因为它具有相似的营养成分和风味特征,且氨基酸含量更高。