Bakhsh Allah, Lee Se-Jin, Lee Eun-Yeong, Hwang Young-Hwa, Joo Seon-Tea
Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
Institute of Agriculture & Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2021 Nov;41(6):983-996. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2021.e50. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
This study explored the physicochemical, textural, and sensorial properties of a meat analog (MA) as compared to beef and pork meats. Results illustrate that MA patties had lower moisture, fat, and protein content, as well as higher ash and crude fiber than beef and pork. Likewise, MA patties had a higher pH, lightness (L*), and redness (a*) than either beef or pork. Pork meat exhibited the highest released water (RW) and cooking loss (CL) values, followed closely by MA with beef displaying the lowest values. Regardless of patty type, the post-cooking diameter patties were reduced significantly (p<0.05). However, the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), hardness, chewiness, and gumminess of beef were significantly higher than that of either pork or MA. The visible appearance of MA patties had more porous and loose structures before and after cooking. Consequently, based on sensory parameters, MA patties demonstrated the higher values for appearance and firmness, followed by beef and pork respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that some physicochemical, textural, and sensory characteristics of beef and pork exhibited the most similarity to MA.
本研究探究了一种肉类替代品(MA)与牛肉和猪肉相比的物理化学、质地和感官特性。结果表明,MA肉饼的水分、脂肪和蛋白质含量较低,灰分和粗纤维含量高于牛肉和猪肉。同样,MA肉饼的pH值、亮度(L*)和红度(a*)高于牛肉或猪肉。猪肉的释水率(RW)和烹饪损失(CL)值最高,其次是MA,牛肉的值最低。无论肉饼类型如何,烹饪后肉饼的直径均显著减小(p<0.05)。然而,牛肉的沃纳-布拉茨勒剪切力(WBSF)、硬度、咀嚼性和黏性显著高于猪肉或MA。MA肉饼在烹饪前后的可见外观具有更多的多孔和松散结构。因此,基于感官参数,MA肉饼的外观和紧实度得分较高,其次分别是牛肉和猪肉,尽管差异无统计学意义。因此,当前研究表明,牛肉和猪肉的一些物理化学、质地和感官特性与MA最为相似。