School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, England.
J Homosex. 2020;67(3):315-324. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2018.1528079. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
This think piece provides a critical analysis of the terms , and (LGBTQ) from an international perspective that draws on citizenship studies, providing some indications of the implications for LGBTQ studies. It outlines difficulties with the LGBTQ acronym in the Global North and South. Internationally, scholarship to support the human rights of non-heterosexuals and gender-diverse people is badly needed, but the think piece concludes that it is crucial to consider the social context of different cases, and to address the materialist, cultural, neo-colonial, and other forces that affect the formation of non-heterosexual and gender-diverse identities.
这篇专题文章从国际视角对术语“LGBTQ”进行了批判性分析,借鉴了公民身份研究,为 LGBTQ 研究提供了一些启示。文章概述了 LGBTQ 缩写在南北半球国家的应用困难。在国际上,迫切需要支持非异性恋者和性别多样化人群的人权的学术研究,但本文认为,重要的是要考虑不同案例的社会背景,并解决影响非异性恋和性别多样化身份形成的唯物主义、文化、新殖民主义和其他因素。