Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.
University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, Fallon, Nevada, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205760. eCollection 2018.
Restoration of agricultural fields is challenging, especially in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. We conducted experiments in two fields in the Great Basin, USA, which differed in cultivation history and fertility. We tested the effects of different levels of functional diversity (planting grasses and shrubs together, vs. planting shrubs alone), seed source (cultivars, local or distant wild-collections), and irrigation regime (spring or fall and spring) on restoration outcomes. We sowed either: 1) grasses and shrubs in year one, 2) shrubs only, in year one, 3) grasses in year one with herbicide, shrubs in year two, or 4) shrubs alone in year two, after a year of herbicide. We irrigated for two years and monitored for three years. Shrub emergence was highest in the lower fertility field, where increasing functional diversity by seeding grasses had a neutral or facilitative effect on shrub emergence. In the higher fertility field, increasing functional diversity appeared to have a neutral to competitive effect. After declines in shrub densities after irrigation ceased, these effects did not persist. Grasses initially suppressed or had a neutral effect on weeds relative to an unseeded control, but had neutral or facilitative effects on weeds relative to shrub-only seeding. Initially, commercial grasses were either equivalent to or outperformed wild-collected grasses, but after irrigation ceased, commercial grasses were outperformed by wild-collected grasses in the higher fertility field. Local shrubs initially outperformed distant shrubs, but this effect did not persist. Fall and spring irrigation combined with local shrubs and wild-collected grasses was the most successful strategy in the higher fertility field, while in the lower fertility field, irrigation timing had fewer effects. Superior shrub emergence and higher grass persistence indicated that the use of wild and local seed sources is generally warranted, whereas the effects of functional diversity and irrigation regime were context-dependent. A bet-hedging approach that uses a variety of strategies may maximize the chances of restoration success.
农田恢复具有挑战性,尤其是在干旱和半干旱生态系统中。我们在美国大盆地的两个具有不同耕作历史和肥力的农田进行了实验。我们测试了不同水平的功能多样性(种植草和灌木,与单独种植灌木相比)、种子来源(品种、本地或远距离野生收集)和灌溉制度(春季或秋季和春季)对恢复结果的影响。我们播种了以下几种方式:1)在第一年种植草和灌木,2)在第一年只种植灌木,3)在第一年用除草剂种植草,第二年种植灌木,或 4)在第二年用除草剂种植灌木。我们灌溉了两年,监测了三年。灌木的出现率在肥力较低的田地最高,在那里,通过播种草增加功能多样性对灌木的出现率有中性或促进作用。在肥力较高的田地,增加功能多样性似乎有中性到竞争的影响。在灌溉停止后灌木密度下降后,这些影响不再持续。与未播种对照相比,草最初对杂草有抑制或中性作用,但与仅播种灌木相比,对杂草有中性或促进作用。最初,商业草与野生收集草的表现相当或优于野生收集草,但在灌溉停止后,商业草在肥力较高的田地表现不如野生收集草。本地灌木最初优于远距离灌木,但这种效果并不持久。秋季和春季灌溉与本地灌木和野生收集草相结合是在肥力较高的田地中最成功的策略,而在肥力较低的田地中,灌溉时间的影响较小。优越的灌木出现率和较高的草持久性表明,一般来说,使用野生和本地种子来源是合理的,而功能多样性和灌溉制度的影响则取决于具体情况。使用多种策略的套期保值方法可能最大限度地提高恢复成功的机会。