• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母亲身份、堕胎和贫困的医学化。

Motherhood, Abortion, and the Medicalization of Poverty.

机构信息

Michelle Oberman, J.D., M.P.H., is the Alexander Professor of Law, Santa Clara University; author, Her Body, Our Laws: On the Frontlines of the Abortion War from El Salvador to Oklahoma (2018).

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;46(3):665-671. doi: 10.1177/1073110518804221.

DOI:10.1177/1073110518804221
PMID:30336087
Abstract

This article considers the impact of laws and policies that determine who experiences unplanned pregnancy, who has abortions, and how economic status shapes one's response to unplanned pregnancy. There is a well-documented correlation between abortion and poverty: poor women have more abortions than do their richer sisters. Equally well-documented is the correlation between unplanned pregnancy and poverty. Finally, the high cost of motherhood for poor women and their offspring manifests in disproportionately high lifelong rates of poverty, ill-health and mortality for offspring and mothers, alike. Read together, these factors offer a vivid illustration of the medicalization of poverty.

摘要

本文考虑了法律和政策的影响,这些法律和政策决定了谁经历意外怀孕、谁进行堕胎,以及经济状况如何影响人们对意外怀孕的反应。堕胎和贫困之间存在着有充分记录的关联:贫困妇女比富裕妇女堕胎更多。同样有充分记录的是意外怀孕和贫困之间的关联。最后,贫困妇女及其子女生育的高成本表现为其后代和母亲的终生贫困率、健康状况不佳和死亡率都过高。这些因素放在一起,生动地说明了贫困的医学化。

相似文献

1
Motherhood, Abortion, and the Medicalization of Poverty.母亲身份、堕胎和贫困的医学化。
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;46(3):665-671. doi: 10.1177/1073110518804221.
2
The Over-Medicalization and Corrupted Medicalization of Abortion and its Effect on Women Living in Poverty.堕胎的过度医疗化和腐败医疗化及其对贫困妇女的影响。
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Sep;46(3):672-679. doi: 10.1177/1073110518804222.
3
Family planning issues relating to maternal and infant mortality in the United States.美国与母婴死亡率相关的计划生育问题。
Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1993;27(2):120-34.
4
Choice at any cost.不惜一切代价做出选择。
World Watch. 1988 Mar-Apr;1(2):30-8.
5
Political Institutions and the Comparative Medicalization of Abortion.政治制度与堕胎的比较医学化。
J Health Soc Behav. 2019 Jun;60(2):138-152. doi: 10.1177/0022146519843935. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.公共资助的避孕服务对意外怀孕的影响及其对医疗补助支出的意义。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95.
7
Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans.堕胎保险范围在公共和私人保险计划中都存在争议。
State Reprod Health Monit. 1996 Sep;7(3):5-6.
8
Unintended pregnancy in the United States.美国的意外怀孕。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jan-Feb;30(1):24-9, 46.
9
The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.避孕措施改善对西方国家生育率和堕胎率的潜在影响。
Eur J Popul. 1987 Nov;3(1):7-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01797090.
10
Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.美国的计划生育政策:堕胎与避孕的趋同政治
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Stalled Revolution? Misoprostol and the Pharmaceuticalization of Reproductive Health in Francophone Africa.一场停滞的革命?米索前列醇与法语非洲地区生殖健康的药物化
Front Sociol. 2021 Apr 12;6:590556. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.590556. eCollection 2021.