• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意偏向的时变动力学:性别差异、任务时间参数和刺激效价的影响。

Temporal dynamics in attention bias: effects of sex differences, task timing parameters, and stimulus valence.

机构信息

a Department of Psychological Science , Northern Michigan University , Marquette , MI , USA.

b Data Services , New York University , New York City , NY , USA.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1271-1276. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1536648. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2018.1536648
PMID:30336735
Abstract

New methods of calculating indices from the dot-probe task measure temporal dynamics in attention bias or fluctuations in attention bias towards and away from emotional stimuli over time. However, it is unclear how task-specific parameters such as stimulus valence and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) as well as participant sex affect temporal dynamics in attention bias. To address this, male and female participants ( = 106) completed either a fearful or happy face dot-probe task with four levels of SOA (84 ms, 168 ms, 336 ms, and 672 ms). Results suggest that temporal dynamics in attention bias are (1) greatest at the longest SOA, (2) greater in females, and (3) insensitive to stimulus valence. These findings indicate that participant sex and task timing, but not stimulus valence, are related to temporal dynamics in attention bias and should be considered in future studies utilizing this approach.

摘要

新的计算指标的方法源于点探测任务,可测量注意力偏向的时间动态,或者随着时间的推移,对情绪刺激的注意力偏向和偏离的波动。然而,任务特异性参数(例如刺激效价和刺激起始时距(SOA))以及参与者性别如何影响注意力偏向的时间动态尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,男性和女性参与者(n=106)分别完成了恐惧或快乐面孔点探测任务,其中 SOA 有四个水平(84ms、168ms、336ms 和 672ms)。结果表明,注意力偏向的时间动态(1)在最长的 SOA 时最大,(2)在女性中更大,(3)对刺激效价不敏感。这些发现表明,参与者性别和任务时间安排,而不是刺激效价,与注意力偏向的时间动态有关,在未来使用这种方法的研究中应加以考虑。

相似文献

1
Temporal dynamics in attention bias: effects of sex differences, task timing parameters, and stimulus valence.注意偏向的时变动力学:性别差异、任务时间参数和刺激效价的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Sep;33(6):1271-1276. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1536648. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Facial expression movement enhances the measurement of temporal dynamics of attentional bias in the dot-probe task.面部表情运动增强了在点探测任务中注意力偏向的时间动态测量。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:58-70. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task.点探测任务中的短暂可靠性。
Psychol Res. 2019 Mar;83(2):308-320. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0947-6. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.点探测任务中对面孔注意偏向的事件相关电位:一项系统综述。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13051. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13051. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.毕竟它还是出现了:点探测任务中对笑脸的注意偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y.
6
Attentional bias and its temporal dynamics among war veterans suffering from chronic pain: Investigating the contribution of post-traumatic stress symptoms.慢性疼痛的退伍军人的注意偏向及其时间动态:探究创伤后应激症状的贡献。
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Aug;66:102115. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102115. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Electrocortical evidence for the time course processes of attentional bias toward infant faces.对婴儿面孔注意偏向时间进程的皮层电活动证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2019 Mar 23;696:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.020. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.愤怒的咆哮:对愤怒面孔的牙齿暴露和焦虑相关注意力偏向。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207695. eCollection 2018.
9
Exploring the fMRI based neural correlates of the dot probe task and its modulation by sex and body odor.探究基于 fMRI 的点探测任务的神经关联及其被性别和体臭的调制。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Jan;99:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Gamma-band activity reflects attentional guidance by facial expression.γ 波段活动反映了表情的注意力引导。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:1142-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye-size effects in the dot-probe task: Greater sclera exposure predicts delayed disengagement from fearful faces.眼大小效应对点探测任务的影响:巩膜暴露程度越大,对恐惧面孔的脱离延迟越大。
PLoS One. 2023 May 17;18(5):e0285839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285839. eCollection 2023.
2
Reliability of attention bias and attention bias variability to climate change images in the dot-probe task.点探测任务中对气候变化图像的注意偏向和注意偏向变异性的可靠性
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1021858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021858. eCollection 2022.
3
The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks.
注意偏向变异性的有效性存疑:来自两项概念上不相关认知任务的证据。
J Affect Disord Rep. 2022 Dec;10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
Attentional bias to threat and gray matter volume morphology in high anxious individuals.高焦虑个体的威胁注意偏向与灰质体积形态。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jun;22(3):600-609. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00968-9. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Sex Differences in Anxiety: An Investigation of the Moderating Role of Sex in Performance Monitoring and Attentional Bias to Threat in High Trait Anxious Individuals.焦虑中的性别差异:对高特质焦虑个体在绩效监测和对威胁的注意偏向中性别调节作用的调查。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 May 20;15:627589. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.627589. eCollection 2021.
6
The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores.点探测任务中注意偏向测量的稳定性和可靠性:来自传统平均偏向分数和试验水平偏向分数的证据。
Motiv Emot. 2020 Oct;44(5):657-669. doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09834-6. Epub 2020 May 24.
7
Low Salivary Testosterone Level Is Associated With Efficient Attention Holding by Self Face in Women.唾液睾酮水平低与女性对自我面孔的有效注意力维持有关。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Nov 29;13:261. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00261. eCollection 2019.
8
Climate change images produce an attentional bias associated with pro-environmental disposition.气候变化图像会产生一种与亲环境倾向相关的注意力偏差。
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):385-390. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00902-5. Epub 2019 Jan 23.