Suppr超能文献

膀胱肿瘤再次经尿道切除术的效用

Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

作者信息

Manoharan Vignesh, Mavuduru Ravimohan Suryanarayan, Kumar Santosh, Kakkar Nandita, Devana Sudheer Kumar, Bora Girdhar Singh, Singh Shrawan Kumar, Mandal Arup Kumar

机构信息

Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):273-277. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_218_17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) aims at complete resection of all the visible tumors. Existing guidelines recommend restage TURBT in all patients with T1 and high-grade tumors, to avoid under-staging. However, restage TURBT may not be plausible/feasible at all the times. This study was performed with an aim to better define the utility of restage TURBT in a tertiary care hospital of India.

METHODS

Patients with high grade/T1 tumors at the first TURBT were prospectively enrolled. Their demographic profile, previous cystoscopic findings, and histological reports were recorded. The primary objective was to assess the tumor detection and stage up-migration rates at restage TURBT. The secondary objectives was to identify factors predicting presence of tumor at restage TURBT. Patients were followed up to detect recurrence and progression for a minimum of 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 128 prospective patients' enrolled, 29 patients were lost to follow-up and 11 patients did not undergo restage. A total of eighty-eight patients underwent restage TURBT of which twenty-eight patients (31.8%) had tumor at their second TURBT with five of these patients being upstaged to T2. The risk of having a tumor at restage was significantly higher in patients with solid tumors (56.2% vs. 26.4%, = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.024) but was independent of the tumor size ( = 0.472), number of growths ( = 0.267), grade of tumor ( = 0.441), presence or absence of muscle at the initial TURBT ( = 0.371) and place of initial TURBT ( = 0.289). There was a significant difference in the recurrence and progression rates in patients who had tumor at restage as compared to those who did not (recurrence; 33.3% and 23.8%, = 0.022, respectively vs. progression; 11.1% and 3.7% respectively, = 0.07; mean follow-up = 10.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that restage TURBT is necessary in patients with solid looking tumors and the presence of tumor at restage confers a higher risk of recurrence and progression.

摘要

引言

经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)旨在完全切除所有可见肿瘤。现有指南建议对所有T1期和高级别肿瘤患者进行再次分期TURBT,以避免分期不足。然而,再次分期TURBT并非在所有情况下都可行。本研究旨在更好地明确在印度一家三级医疗中心再次分期TURBT的效用。

方法

前瞻性纳入首次TURBT时患有高级别/T1期肿瘤的患者。记录他们的人口统计学资料、先前的膀胱镜检查结果和组织学报告。主要目的是评估再次分期TURBT时的肿瘤检出率和分期上调率。次要目的是确定预测再次分期TURBT时肿瘤存在的因素。对患者进行至少3个月的随访以检测复发和进展情况。

结果

在纳入的128例前瞻性患者中,29例失访,11例未进行再次分期。共有88例患者接受了再次分期TURBT,其中28例患者(31.8%)在第二次TURBT时发现有肿瘤,其中5例患者分期上调至T2期。实体瘤患者再次分期时出现肿瘤的风险显著更高(56.2%对26.4%,P = 0.02,95%置信区间:0.035 - 0.024),但与肿瘤大小(P = 0.472)、肿瘤数量(P = 0.267)、肿瘤分级(P = 0.441)、初次TURBT时是否有肌层浸润(P = 0.371)以及初次TURBT的地点(P = 0.289)无关。再次分期时有肿瘤的患者与没有肿瘤的患者相比,复发率和进展率有显著差异(复发率分别为33.3%和23.8%,P = 0.022;进展率分别为11.1%和3.7%,P = 0.07;平均随访时间 = 10.8个月)。

结论

我们得出结论,对于外观为实体瘤的患者,再次分期TURBT是必要的,并且再次分期时存在肿瘤会带来更高的复发和进展风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f52/6174718/955e13ab90fc/IJU-34-273-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验