Suppr超能文献

两种静态拉伸程序对髋内收肌柔韧性和力量影响的比较。

Comparison of Two Static Stretching Procedures on Hip Adductor Flexibility and Strength.

作者信息

Fjerstad Brandon M, Hammer Roger L, Hammer Adam M, Connolly Gavin, Lomond Karen V, O'Connor Paul

机构信息

Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, School of Health Sciences, Division of Exercise Science, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA.

Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Oct 1;11(6):1074-1085. doi: 10.70252/ZFUC8076. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

It has been shown that acute static stretching (SS) may increase flexibility, improve performance and reduce the risk of muscle strains, but may also result in decreased maximal force output. Literature review revealed little research had specifically been done on the most effective ways to stretch the hip adductor muscles. The purpose was to determine the effects that an acute bout of SS (active vs passive) has on hip adductor flexibility and maintenance of strength. Randomized cross-over study using a 3 × 2 (Condition X Time) repeated measures ANOVA statistical design. Forty healthy and physically active subjects (20 male and 20 female) that screened positive for limited flexibility in hip adductor range of motion (ROM) participated. Following a warm-up, baseline maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) and peak static ROM tests were administered. On separate days subjects randomly performed either 60 seconds of passive SS, active SS, or a time-matched control protocol before post measures were recorded for MVC and ROM. There was a significant time effect (p<0.001) that revealed both types of SS and control resulted in increased ROM pre-to-post (passive = 1.0; active = 1.1; control = 0.6 degrees) with no between condition differences (p=0.171). Neither type of SS resulted in reduced strength. Both methods minimally increased hip adductor flexibility without a decrease in force output. This suggests that individuals do not need to avoid SS for the hip adductors prior to engaging in physical activity for fear of a strength decrement.

摘要

研究表明,急性静态拉伸(SS)可能会增加柔韧性、提高运动表现并降低肌肉拉伤的风险,但也可能导致最大力量输出下降。文献综述显示,关于拉伸髋内收肌最有效方法的具体研究很少。目的是确定一次急性SS(主动拉伸与被动拉伸)对髋内收肌柔韧性和力量维持的影响。采用3×2(条件X时间)重复测量方差分析统计设计的随机交叉研究。40名健康且身体活跃、髋内收肌活动范围(ROM)柔韧性有限筛查呈阳性的受试者(20名男性和20名女性)参与了研究。热身之后,进行基线最大自主等长收缩(MVC)和静态ROM峰值测试。在不同日期,受试者在记录MVC和ROM的测量后值之前,随机进行60秒的被动SS、主动SS或时间匹配的对照方案。存在显著的时间效应(p < 0.001),表明两种类型的SS和对照均导致ROM前后增加(被动 = 1.0;主动 = 1.1;对照 = 0.6度),条件之间无差异(p = 0.171)。两种类型的SS均未导致力量下降。两种方法均使髋内收肌柔韧性略有增加,且力量输出未降低。这表明个体在进行体育活动之前无需因担心力量下降而避免对髋内收肌进行SS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d881/6179425/fd871455c4f3/ijes-11-6-1074f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验