Konrad A, Stafilidis S, Tilp M
Sport Science, Graz University, Graz, Austria.
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Oct;27(10):1070-1080. doi: 10.1111/sms.12725. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a single static, ballistic, or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching exercise on the various muscle-tendon parameters of the lower leg and to detect possible differences in the effects between the methods. Volunteers (n = 122) were randomly divided into static, ballistic, and PNF stretching groups and a control group. Before and after the 4 × 30 s stretching intervention, we determined the maximum dorsiflexion range of motion (RoM) with the corresponding fascicle length and pennation angle of the gastrocnemius medialis. Passive resistive torque (PRT) and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were measured with a dynamometer. Observation of muscle-tendon junction (MTJ) displacement with ultrasound allowed us to determine the length changes in the tendon and muscle, respectively, and hence to calculate stiffness. Although RoM increased (static: +4.3%, ballistic: +4.5%, PNF: +3.5%), PRT (static: -11.4%, ballistic: -11.5%, PNF: -13,7%), muscle stiffness (static: -13.1%, ballistic: -20.3%, PNF: -20.2%), and muscle-tendon stiffness (static: -11.3%, ballistic: -10.5%, PNF: -13.7%) decreased significantly in all the stretching groups. Only in the PNF stretching group, the pennation angle in the stretched position (-4.2%) and plantar flexor MVC (-4.6%) decreased significantly. Multivariate analysis showed no clinically relevant difference between the stretching groups. The increase in RoM and the decrease in PRT and muscle-tendon stiffness could be explained by more compliant muscle tissue following a single static, ballistic, or PNF stretching exercise.
本研究旨在探讨单次静态、弹道式或本体感觉神经肌肉促进(PNF)拉伸运动对小腿各种肌肉-肌腱参数的影响,并检测这些方法之间效果的可能差异。志愿者(n = 122)被随机分为静态拉伸组、弹道式拉伸组、PNF拉伸组和对照组。在进行4×30秒的拉伸干预前后,我们测定了最大背屈活动范围(RoM)以及相应的腓肠肌内侧肌束长度和羽状角。使用测力计测量被动阻力矩(PRT)和最大自主收缩(MVC)。通过超声观察肌肉-肌腱连接处(MTJ)的位移,使我们能够分别确定肌腱和肌肉的长度变化,从而计算刚度。尽管所有拉伸组的RoM均增加(静态:+4.3%,弹道式:+4.5%,PNF:+3.5%),但PRT(静态:-11.4%,弹道式:-11.5%,PNF:-13.7%)、肌肉刚度(静态:-13.1%,弹道式:-20.3%,PNF:-20.2%)和肌肉-肌腱刚度(静态:-11.3%,弹道式:-10.5%,PNF:-13.7%)均显著降低。仅在PNF拉伸组中,拉伸位置的羽状角(-4.2%)和跖屈肌MVC(-4.6%)显著降低。多变量分析显示各拉伸组之间无临床相关差异。单次静态、弹道式或PNF拉伸运动后,肌肉组织顺应性增加可解释RoM的增加以及PRT和肌肉-肌腱刚度的降低。