• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者延迟使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗起始治疗的效果:一项使用边际结构模型的观察性行政索赔数据库分析

The effect of delaying initiation with umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: an observational administrative claims database analysis using marginal structural models.

作者信息

Buikema Ami R, Brekke Lee, Anderson Amy, Koep Eleena, Van Voorhis Damon, Sharpsten Lucie, Hahn Beth, Ray Riju, Stanford Richard H

机构信息

1Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Optum, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA.

2US Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3398 USA.

出版信息

Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018 Oct 11;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0151-6. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40248-018-0151-6
PMID:30338068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6180385/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with high clinical and economic burden. Optimal pharmacological therapy for COPD aims to reduce symptoms and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. Umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is an approved combination therapy for once-daily maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. This study evaluated the impact of delaying UMEC/VI initiation on medical costs and exacerbation risk.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with COPD who initiated UMEC/VI between 4/28/2014 and 7/31/2016 was conducted using the Optum Research Database. The index date was the first COPD visit after UMEC/VI available on US formulary (Commercial 4/28/2014; Medicare Advantage 1/1/2015). Patients were followed for 12 months post-index, and categorized into 12 cohorts corresponding to month (30-day period) of UMEC/VI initiation (i.e. Months 1-12) post-index. The outcomes studied during the follow up period included COPD-related and all-cause medical costs, and risk of COPD exacerbations. Marginal structural models (MSM) were used to control for time-varying confounding due to changes in treatment and severity during follow up.

RESULTS

2,200 patients initiating UMEC/VI were included in the study sample. Patients' average age was 69.3 years, 49.9% were female and 69.7% were Medicare insured. Following MSM analysis, 12-month adjusted COPD-related medical costs increased by 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-5.9%;  = 0.044) for each monthly delay in UMEC/VI initiation, with a 37.4% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI in Month 12 versus Month 1 ($13,087 vs. $9524). The 12-month adjusted all-cause medical costs increased by 2.8% (95% CI: 0.6-5.2%;  = 0.013) for each monthly delay, with a 36.1% higher adjusted cost for patients initiating UMEC/VI at Month 12 versus Month 1 ($22,766 vs. $16,727). The monthly risk of severe exacerbation was significantly higher in patients who had not yet initiated UMEC/VI than those who had (hazard ratio: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.35-2.23;  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prompt use of UMEC/VI following a physician visit for COPD appears to result in economic and clinical benefits, with reductions in medical costs and exacerbation risk. Additional research is warranted to assess the benefits of initiating UMEC/VI as a first-line therapy compared with escalation to UMEC/VI from monotherapies.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)具有较高的临床和经济负担。COPD的最佳药物治疗旨在减轻症状以及降低急性加重的频率和严重程度。乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)是一种已获批准的联合疗法,用于COPD患者的每日一次维持治疗。本研究评估了延迟启动UMEC/VI对医疗费用和急性加重风险的影响。

方法

利用Optum研究数据库对2014年4月28日至2016年7月31日期间开始使用UMEC/VI的COPD患者进行回顾性分析。索引日期为UMEC/VI在美国药品处方集上可用后的首次COPD就诊日期(商业保险:2014年4月28日;医疗保险优势计划:2015年1月1日)。患者在索引日期后随访12个月,并根据索引日期后启动UMEC/VI的月份(30天时间段)分为12个队列(即第1 - 12个月)。随访期间研究的结局包括COPD相关和全因医疗费用以及COPD急性加重风险。采用边际结构模型(MSM)来控制随访期间因治疗和病情严重程度变化导致的随时间变化的混杂因素。

结果

2200例开始使用UMEC/VI的患者纳入研究样本。患者的平均年龄为69.3岁,49.9%为女性,69.7%有医疗保险。经过MSM分析,UMEC/VI启动每延迟一个月,12个月调整后的COPD相关医疗费用增加2.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.1 - 5.9%;P = 0.044),与第1个月开始使用UMEC/VI的患者相比,第12个月开始使用的患者调整后的费用高出37.4%(分别为13,087美元和9524美元)。UMEC/VI启动每延迟一个月,12个月调整后的全因医疗费用增加2.8%(95% CI:0.6 - 5.2%;P = 0.013),第12个月开始使用UMEC/VI的患者与第1个月开始使用的患者相比,调整后的费用高出36.1%(分别为22,766美元和16,727美元)。尚未开始使用UMEC/VI的患者每月发生严重急性加重的风险显著高于已开始使用的患者(风险比:1.74;95% CI:1.35 - 2.23;P < 0.001)。

结论

在因COPD就诊后及时使用UMEC/VI似乎能带来经济和临床益处,可降低医疗费用和急性加重风险。有必要进行更多研究以评估与从单一疗法升级至UMEC/VI相比,将UMEC/VI作为一线疗法启动的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/978e1c8c05d9/40248_2018_151_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/4da8e18b8f63/40248_2018_151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/ae78268802f2/40248_2018_151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/0d222bca841e/40248_2018_151_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/978e1c8c05d9/40248_2018_151_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/4da8e18b8f63/40248_2018_151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/ae78268802f2/40248_2018_151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/0d222bca841e/40248_2018_151_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a424/6180385/978e1c8c05d9/40248_2018_151_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of delaying initiation with umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD: an observational administrative claims database analysis using marginal structural models.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者延迟使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗起始治疗的效果:一项使用边际结构模型的观察性行政索赔数据库分析
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2018 Oct 11;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s40248-018-0151-6. eCollection 2018.
2
Clinical and economic outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease initiating maintenance therapy with tiotropium bromide/olodaterol or fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol.中文译文:噻托溴铵/奥达特罗或糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病维持治疗患者的临床和经济结局。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jul;29(7):791-806. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22373. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Hospital Admission and Readmission Among US Patients Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病初始维持治疗使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗或噻托溴铵的患者的住院和再入院情况
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):203-219. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00151-y. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Real-world effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a retrospective cohort study.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)初始维持治疗的真实世界疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Aug 1;14:1721-1737. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S204649. eCollection 2019.
5
Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation.在 COPD 加重后,即刻使用与延迟使用单吸入器糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)的获益。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Mar 5;17:491-504. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S337668. eCollection 2022.
6
Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Compared with Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol, Budesonide/Formoterol, and Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy in Patients with COPD Who Have High Costs and Comorbidities.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗、布地奈德/福莫特罗和噻托溴铵相比,用于具有高成本和合并症的 COPD 患者的初始维持治疗。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Apr 22;16:1149-1161. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S298032. eCollection 2021.
7
Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD in England following an exacerbation: a retrospective cohort study.在英国,COPD 患者在加重后立即使用单一吸入氟替卡松糠酸酯、乌美溴铵和维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)的益处:一项回顾性队列研究。
Respir Res. 2023 Sep 25;24(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02523-1.
8
COPD Exacerbations, Costs, and Health Care Resource Utilization Before and After Initiation of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Routine Care in the USA.在美国常规护理中,在开始使用糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗后,COPD 加重、成本和卫生保健资源利用的变化。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Mar 24;18:407-418. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S378867. eCollection 2023.
9
Outcomes Following Initiation of Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Among Medicare Advantage with Part D Beneficiaries and Those Commercially Enrolled for Health Care Insurance in the United States.在美国,医疗保险优势计划和商业健康保险参保者中,与多种吸入器三联疗法相比,糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗三联疗法起始治疗后的结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jan 11;19:97-110. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S424497. eCollection 2024.
10
Healthcare Resource Utilization, Cost and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with COPD Initiating Tiotropium Bromide/Olodaterol versus Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Based on Exacerbation History.基于加重史的 COPD 患者使用噻托溴铵/奥达特罗与糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗治疗的卫生资源利用、成本和临床结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Apr 19;18:625-641. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S386962. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Exacerbations and Real-World Outcomes After Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate, Among Patients with COPD: Results from the EROS (US) Study.在 COPD 患者中,布地奈德/格隆溴铵/福莫特罗富马酸盐单一吸入三联疗法后的加重和真实世界结局:来自 EROS(美国)研究的结果。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Oct 12;18:2245-2256. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S432963. eCollection 2023.
2
Prompt initiation of triple therapy following hospitalization for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation in the United States: An analysis of the PRIMUS study.美国慢性阻塞性肺病加重住院后启动三联疗法的提示:PRIMUS 研究分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Dec;28(12):1366-1377. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1366.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The 2017 Update to the COPD Foundation COPD Pocket Consultant Guide.慢性阻塞性肺疾病基金会《慢性阻塞性肺疾病袖珍咨询指南》2017年更新版
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017 Jul 15;4(3):177-185. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.3.2017.0136.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium/vilanterol for the management of patients with moderate to very severe COPD using an economic model.使用经济模型对乌美溴铵/维兰特罗治疗中度至非常严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的成本效益分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 24;12:997-1008. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S124420. eCollection 2017.
3
Umeclidinium/vilanterol as step-up therapy from tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD: a randomized, parallel-group, 12-week study.
Characteristics of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Long-Acting Bronchodilators in a Real-World Setting in Singapore: A Single-Center Observational Study.新加坡真实世界环境中长效支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的特征:一项单中心观察性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Jun 9;17:1349-1363. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S357820. eCollection 2022.
4
PRIMUS - Prompt Initiation of Maintenance Therapy in the US: A Real-World Analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Patients Initiating Triple Therapy Following a COPD Exacerbation.PRIMUS-美国维持治疗的启动:COPD 加重后开始三联疗法的患者的临床和经济结局的真实世界分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Feb 10;17:329-342. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S347735. eCollection 2022.
5
Hospital Admission and Readmission Among US Patients Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病初始维持治疗使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗或噻托溴铵的患者的住院和再入院情况
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):203-219. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00151-y. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Evaluation of rescue medication use and medication adherence receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium bromide/olodaterol.评估乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与噻托溴铵/奥达特罗的急救药物使用和药物依从性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 4;14:2047-2060. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S213520. eCollection 2019.
7
Evidence-based review of data on the combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD.对 COPD 患者联合吸入剂乌美溴铵/维兰特罗数据的循证回顾。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 6;14:1251-1265. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S191845. eCollection 2019.
对于中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗作为噻托溴铵的升级治疗:一项随机、平行组、为期12周的研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Feb 24;12:745-755. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119032. eCollection 2017.
4
A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD.一项评估乌美溴铵/维兰特罗62.5/25μg对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康相关生活质量疗效的随机平行组研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 May 9;11:971-9. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S102962. eCollection 2016.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (UMEC/VI) Combination Therapy Among Symptomatic COPD Patients.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)联合疗法在有症状慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的成本效益
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A595. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2053. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
6
The lung function profile of once-daily tiotropium and olodaterol via Respimat(®) is superior to that of twice-daily salmeterol and fluticasone propionate via Accuhaler(®) (ENERGITO(®) study).通过Respimat(®)每日一次使用噻托溴铵和奥达特罗的肺功能情况优于通过Accuhaler(®)每日两次使用沙美特罗和丙酸氟替卡松的情况(ENERGITO(®)研究)。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Feb 4;11:193-205. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S95055. eCollection 2016.
7
Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy umeclidinium/vilanterol versus tiotropium in symptomatic COPD Spanish patients.在有症状的西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗联合疗法与噻托溴铵的成本效益比较
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Jan 18;11:123-32. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S94006. eCollection 2016.
8
Magnitude of umeclidinium/vilanterol lung function effect depends on monotherapy responses: Results from two randomised controlled trials.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗对肺功能影响的程度取决于单药治疗反应:两项随机对照试验的结果
Respir Med. 2016 Mar;112:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol combination therapy compared to tiotropium monotherapy among symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the UK.在英国有症状的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,与噻托溴铵单药治疗相比,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗联合治疗的成本效益。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015 Dec 12;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12962-015-0048-6. eCollection 2015.
10
Global burden of COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的全球负担。
Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/resp.12660. Epub 2015 Oct 23.