Bian Haiyi, Wang Peng, Wang Ning, Tian Yubing, Bai Pengli, Jiang Haowen, Gao Jing
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Medical Optics, Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215163, China.
Schott Glass Technologies (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215009, China.
Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Jul 5;9(8):3512-3522. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.003512. eCollection 2018 Aug 1.
The discrimination accuracy for human and nonhuman blood is important for customs inspection and forensic applications. Recently, Raman spectroscopy has shown effectiveness in analyzing blood droplets and stains with an excitation wavelength of 785 nm. However, the discrimination of liquid whole blood in a vacuum blood tube using Raman spectroscopy, which is a form of noncontact and nondestructive detection, has not been achieved. An excitation wavelength of 532 nm was chosen to avoid the fluorescent background of the blood tube, at the cost of reduced spectroscopic information and discrimination accuracy. To improve the accuracy and true positive rate (TPR) for human blood, a dual-model analysis method is proposed. First, model 1 was used to discriminate human-unlike nonhuman blood. Model 2 was then used to discriminate human-like nonhuman blood from the "human blood" obtained by model 1. A total of 332 Raman spectra from 10 species were used to build and validate the model. A blind test and external validation demonstrated the effectiveness of the model. Compared with the results obtained by the single partial least-squares model, the discrimination performance was improved. The total accuracy and TPR, which are highly important for practical applications, increased to 99.1% and 97.4% from 87.2% and 90.6%, respectively.
对人类血液和非人类血液进行鉴别对于海关检查和法医应用至关重要。最近,拉曼光谱已显示出在分析激发波长为785 nm的血滴和血迹方面的有效性。然而,尚未实现使用拉曼光谱对真空采血管中的液态全血进行鉴别,拉曼光谱是一种非接触式和非破坏性检测形式。选择532 nm的激发波长以避免采血管的荧光背景,但代价是光谱信息和鉴别准确性降低。为了提高对人类血液的鉴别准确性和真阳性率(TPR),提出了一种双模型分析方法。首先,使用模型1来鉴别非人类血液。然后使用模型2从模型1获得的“人类血液”中鉴别出类似人类的非人类血液。总共使用来自10个物种的332个拉曼光谱来构建和验证模型。盲测和外部验证证明了该模型的有效性。与单偏最小二乘模型获得的结果相比,鉴别性能得到了提高。对于实际应用非常重要的总准确率和TPR分别从87.2%和90.6%提高到了99.1%和97.4%。