Medical Direction and Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Viral Hepat. 2019 Feb;26(2):236-245. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13023. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
People who inject drugs (PWID) are a key high-risk group for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection due to the sharing of needles and drug-preparation equipment. However, only approximately 50% of PWID are currently screened for HCV in Switzerland. At present, screening of PWID occurs in general practice via venepuncture. Compared to venepuncture, screening via rapid antibody saliva and dried blood spot (DBS) tests is well adapted to PWID, who typically have difficult venous access. The cost-effectiveness of an increased access screening programme of PWID (increased screening using rapid antibody saliva tests and DBS tests [semi-quantitative viraemia and viral genotype]) was analysed through a decision tree screening model combined with the outputs of a Markov treatment model. Sensitivity and scenario analyses examined the uncertainty of results. At a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of CHF 100 000 (USD 105 000) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), the increased access screening programme was cost-effective compared to current screening, with a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 7 940 (USD 8337) per QALY. The net monetary benefit was CHF 959 802 668 (USD 1 007 792 801) for the PWID population and CHF 94 469 (USD 99 192) per person. The increased access screening programme had a 97.0% probability of being cost-effective compared to the current screening method at the WTP threshold of CHF 100 000 (USD 105 000). The results showed an increased access screening programme that uses tests which are better suited to the PWID population to be more cost-effective, due to the increased uptake that rapid antibody saliva and DBS tests generate.
注射毒品者(PWID)由于共用针头和毒品制备设备,是丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的一个关键高危群体。然而,目前瑞士只有大约 50%的 PWID 接受 HCV 筛查。目前,PWID 的筛查是在全科医生中通过静脉穿刺进行的。与静脉穿刺相比,通过快速抗体唾液和干血斑(DBS)检测进行筛查更适合 PWID,因为他们通常静脉穿刺困难。通过决策树筛查模型结合马尔可夫治疗模型的输出,分析了增加 PWID 筛查计划(使用快速抗体唾液检测和 DBS 检测增加筛查[半定量病毒血症和病毒基因型])的成本效益。敏感性和情景分析检查了结果的不确定性。在愿意支付(WTP)阈值为每质量调整生命年(QALY)10 万瑞士法郎(10.5 万美元)的情况下,与当前筛查相比,增加筛查计划具有成本效益,基本病例增量成本效益比为每 QALY7940 瑞士法郎(8337 美元)。PWID 人群的净货币收益为 959802668 瑞士法郎(1007792801 美元),每人 94469 瑞士法郎(99192 美元)。与当前筛查方法相比,在 WTP 阈值为 10 万瑞士法郎(10.5 万美元)的情况下,增加筛查计划具有成本效益的可能性为 97.0%。结果表明,由于快速抗体唾液和 DBS 检测的接受度增加,使用更适合 PWID 人群的检测方法进行增加筛查计划具有更高的成本效益。