Kiilerich Bruno, Nielsen Asbjørn H, Vollertsen Jes
Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Thomas Manns Vej 23, DK-9220 Aalborg Ø, Denmark E-mail:
Water Sci Technol. 2018 Oct;78(5-6):1071-1081. doi: 10.2166/wst.2018.382.
Traditionally, sulfide abatement has been done by adding e.g. ferrous or ferric iron salts to the start of sewer force mains. Iron dosage must hence correspond to an estimate of how much sulfide will form while the wastewater stays in the main, which is not straightforward. Adding iron salts at the end of the main has the advantage that the exact amount of sulfide to precipitate, in principle, can be known. A drawback is that the reaction time is short compared to start-of-pipe treatment. Sulfide precipitation rates and the concentration of sulfide left after the process had run to completion were measured using an online hydrogen sulfide probe to resolve the fast precipitation reaction. Experiments were conducted in anaerobic wastewaters spiked with sulfide, and carried out under different pH conditions and with various iron-to-sulfide ratios. Sulfide precipitation rates were demonstrated to be faster with Fe(III) than with Fe(II). Experiments furthermore showed that for Fe(III), pH was the controlling parameter, whereas for Fe(II) both pH and the iron-to-sulfide ratio were important. Proposed are model equations to predict variables for the rate equations, which can be adopted by practitioners dealing with sulfide abatement.
传统上,硫化物的去除是通过在污水压力主管的起始端添加例如亚铁盐或铁盐来实现的。因此,铁的投加量必须与废水在主管中停留期间形成的硫化物量的估计值相对应,而这并非易事。在主管末端添加铁盐的优点是,原则上可以知道需要沉淀的硫化物的确切量。缺点是与管道起始端处理相比,反应时间较短。使用在线硫化氢探头测量硫化物沉淀速率以及在过程结束后残留的硫化物浓度,以解析快速沉淀反应。在添加了硫化物的厌氧废水中进行实验,并在不同的pH条件下以及不同的铁硫比下进行。结果表明Fe(III)的硫化物沉淀速率比Fe(II)更快。实验还表明,对于Fe(III),pH是控制参数,而对于Fe(II),pH和铁硫比都很重要。本文提出了预测速率方程变量的模型方程,可供处理硫化物去除的从业者采用。