间接免疫荧光法与放射免疫分析法检测甲型肝炎病毒IgG和IgM类抗体的比较。
Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence and radioimmunoassay for detecting antibodies against hepatitis A virus of the IgG and IgM classes.
作者信息
Zaratti L, Patti A M, Pileggi D, Franco E, Divizia M, Mirirocchi E, Panà A
出版信息
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1986;65(6):477-80.
PMID:3034306
Abstract
Indirect Immunofluorescence test (IIF) and Radioimmunoassay (RIA) were compared for determining anti-Hepatitis A virus (HAV) IgG and IgM. 142 sera were tested for anti-HAV IgG and 16 for anti-HAV IgM, both with IIF and RIA techniques. The correlation between the results reached 98.6% for anti-HAV IgG and 93.75% for anti-HAV IgM detection, confirming the specificity and sensibility of IIF.
摘要
对间接免疫荧光试验（IIF）和放射免疫测定（RIA）进行了比较，以检测抗甲型肝炎病毒（HAV）IgG和IgM。采用IIF和RIA技术对142份血清进行抗HAV IgG检测，对16份血清进行抗HAV IgM检测。抗HAV IgG检测结果的相关性达到98.6%，抗HAV IgM检测结果的相关性达到93.75%，证实了IIF的特异性和敏感性。
Zotero 插件