Suppr超能文献

足月时因胎儿宫内窘迫行急诊剖宫产和入住新生儿重症监护病房更多地受到胎儿体重的影响,而非脑胎盘比值。

Emergency caesarean for intrapartum fetal compromise and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit at term is more influenced by fetal weight than the cerebroplacental ratio.

机构信息

Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(10):1664-1669. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1526912. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

Abstract

Some studies have suggested that the fetal cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) is an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at term particularly in small for gestational age (SGA) compared to appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the CPR and emergency caesarean for intrapartum fetal compromise (CS IFC) and NICU admission at term after adjusting for estimated fetal weight (EFW) and other confounding factors. This was a retrospective study of women who birthed at the Mater Mother's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia between for women who birthed between January 2000 and April 2017. The CPR was measured within 2 weeks of birth in women that delivered at term and assessed for correlation with CS IFC and admission to NICU. The study cohort was also stratified into four categories according to EFW and CPR thresholds. Appropriate for gestational age (EFW ≥10th centile) and normal CPR (≥10th centile), AGA and low CPR (<10th centile), SGA (EFW <10th centile) and normal CPR and SGA and low CPR. Both CPR <10th centile (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.60, 95% CI 1.82-3.71,  < .001) and EFW <10th centile (aOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.85-3.74,  < .001) demonstrated significant associations with CS IFC. EFW <10th centile (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.61-3.09,  < .001) but not CPR <10th centile (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 0.99-2.01,  = .06) was predictive of NICU admission. When stratified according to EFW and CPR thresholds, SGA had significant odds ratios for CS IFC and NICU admission regardless of CPR status. However, the AGA and low CPR cohort was only at increased risk of CS IFC (aOR 2.09, 95% CI 1.30-3.34,  = .002) but not of admission to NICU. At term, the CPR is an independent risk factor for CS IFC regardless of fetal weight. However, the CPR was only predictive of NICU admission in an SGA cohort. Overall, our findings suggest that fetal size is a more important variable for both CS IFC and NICU admission.

摘要

一些研究表明,胎儿脑胎盘比(CPR)是产时胎儿窘迫和足月时入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的独立预测指标,尤其是在与适于胎龄(AGA)婴儿相比的小于胎龄儿(SGA)中。本研究旨在评估 CPR 与产时胎儿窘迫(CS IFC)和足月时 NICU 入住之间的关联,同时调整估计胎儿体重(EFW)和其他混杂因素。这是一项对澳大利亚布里斯班 Mater Mother's Hospital 分娩的妇女进行的回顾性研究,时间范围为 2000 年 1 月至 2017 年 4 月。CPR 在足月分娩的妇女分娩后 2 周内测量,并评估与 CS IFC 和 NICU 入院的相关性。根据 EFW 和 CPR 阈值,研究队列还分为四个类别。AGA 和正常 CPR(≥第 10 百分位),即适用于胎龄(EFW≥第 10 百分位)和正常 CPR(≥第 10 百分位);AGA 和低 CPR(<第 10 百分位),即 SGA(EFW<第 10 百分位)和正常 CPR 和 SGA 和低 CPR。CPR<第 10 百分位(调整后的优势比(aOR)2.60,95%CI 1.82-3.71,<0.001)和 EFW<第 10 百分位(aOR 2.63,95%CI 1.85-3.74,<0.001)均与 CS IFC 有显著关联。EFW<第 10 百分位(aOR 2.23,95%CI 1.61-3.09,<0.001)但不是 CPR<第 10 百分位(aOR 1.41,95%CI 0.99-2.01,=0.06)与 NICU 入院相关。根据 EFW 和 CPR 阈值分层后,SGA 无论 CPR 状态如何,CS IFC 和 NICU 入院的比值比均有显著差异。然而,AGA 和低 CPR 组仅增加 CS IFC 的风险(aOR 2.09,95%CI 1.30-3.34,=0.002),而不是 NICU 入院的风险。在足月时,CPR 是 CS IFC 的独立危险因素,而与胎儿体重无关。然而,CPR 仅在 SGA 组中预测 NICU 入院。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,胎儿大小是 CS IFC 和 NICU 入院的更重要变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验